Spatial differences and multi-mechanism of carbon footprint based on GWR model in provincial China

被引:0
作者
Shaojian Wang
Chuanglin Fang
Haitao Ma
Yang Wang
Jing Qin
机构
[1] CAS,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[3] Guangzhou Institute of Geography,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2014年 / 24卷
关键词
carbon footprint; spatial differences; multi-mechanism; GWR model; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Global warming has been one of the major concerns behind the world’s high-speed economic growth. How to implement the coordinated development of the carbon footprint and the economy will be the core issue of the world’s economic and social development, as well as the heated debate of the research at home and abroad in recent years. Based on the energy consumption, integrated with the “Top-Down” life cycle approach and geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, this paper analyzed the spatial differences and multi-mechanism of carbon footprint in provincial China in 2010. Firstly, this study calculated the amount of carbon footprint of each province using “Top-Down” life cycle approach and found that there were significant differences of carbon footprint and per capita carbon footprint in provincial China. The provinces with higher carbon footprint, mainly located in northern China, have large economic scales; the provinces with higher per capita carbon footprint are mainly distributed in central cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and energy-rich regions and heavy chemical bases. Secondly, with the aid of GIS and spatial analysis model (GWR model), this paper had unfolded that the expansion of economic scale is the main driver of the rapid growth of carbon footprint. The growth of population and urbanization also acted as promoting factors for the increase of the carbon footprint. Energy structure had no considerable promoting effect for the increase of the carbon footprint. Improving energy efficiency is the most important factor to inhibit the growing carbon footprint. Thirdly, developing low-carbon economies and low-carbon industries, as well as advocating low-carbon city construction and improving carbon efficiency would be the primary approaches to inhibit the rapid growth of carbon footprint. Moderately controlling the economic scale and population size would also be required to alleviate carbon footprint. Meanwhile, environmental protection and construction of low-carbon cities would evoke extensive attention in the process of urbanization.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 630
页数:18
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Brunsdon C(1996)Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity Geographical Analysis 28 281-298
[2]  
Fotheringham A S(1998)Spatial nonstationarity and autoregressive models Environment and Planning A 30 957-973
[3]  
Charlton M(2002)Geographically weighted summary statistics: A framework for localized exploratory data analysis. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 26 501-524
[4]  
Brunsdon C(1998)Carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. economy: A structural decomposition analysis Environmental and Resource Economics 11 349-363
[5]  
Fotheringham A S(1998)Structural decomposition of industrial CO Energy Policy 26 5-12
[6]  
Charlton M(2013) emission in Taiwan: An input-output approach Sino-Global Energy 18 17-22
[7]  
Brunsdon C(2012)A study on the factors affecting carbon emissions in China: Based on input-output model Journal of Geographical Sciences 22 110-124
[8]  
Fotheringham A S(2009)Temporospatial changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China Ecological Economics 68 2066-2077
[9]  
Charlton M(2007)The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model China Population, Resources and Environment 17 94-99
[10]  
Casler S D(2006)The analysis between China’s economic growth and the evolution of the carbon emission Energy Economics 28 170-187