Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review

被引:0
作者
Dennis R. Louie
Janice J. Eng
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences
[2] University of British Columbia,Department of Physical Therapy
[3] Rehabilitation Research Program,undefined
[4] Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | / 13卷
关键词
Stroke; Cerebrovascular accident; Robotic exoskeleton; Gait rehabilitation; Scoping review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Powered robotic exoskeletons are a potential intervention for gait rehabilitation in stroke to enable repetitive walking practice to maximize neural recovery. As this is a relatively new technology for stroke, a scoping review can help guide current research and propose recommendations for advancing the research development. The aim of this scoping review was to map the current literature surrounding the use of robotic exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation in adults post-stroke. Five databases (Pubmed, OVID MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) were searched for articles from inception to October 2015. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed to identify additional studies. Articles were included if they utilized a robotic exoskeleton as a gait training intervention for adult stroke survivors and reported walking outcome measures. Of 441 records identified, 11 studies, all published within the last five years, involving 216 participants met the inclusion criteria. The study designs ranged from pre-post clinical studies (n = 7) to controlled trials (n = 4); five of the studies utilized a robotic exoskeleton device unilaterally, while six used a bilateral design. Participants ranged from sub-acute (<7 weeks) to chronic (>6 months) stroke. Training periods ranged from single-session to 8-week interventions. Main walking outcome measures were gait speed, Timed Up and Go, 6-min Walk Test, and the Functional Ambulation Category. Meaningful improvement with exoskeleton-based gait training was more apparent in sub-acute stroke compared to chronic stroke. Two of the four controlled trials showed no greater improvement in any walking outcomes compared to a control group in chronic stroke. In conclusion, clinical trials demonstrate that powered robotic exoskeletons can be used safely as a gait training intervention for stroke. Preliminary findings suggest that exoskeletal gait training is equivalent to traditional therapy for chronic stroke patients, while sub-acute patients may experience added benefit from exoskeletal gait training. Efforts should be invested in designing rigorous, appropriately powered controlled trials before powered exoskeletons can be translated into a clinical tool for gait rehabilitation post-stroke.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 189 条
[1]  
Feigin VL(2015)Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study Neuroepidemiology 45 161-76
[2]  
Krishnamurthi RV(2011)Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke World Neurosurg 76 S85-90
[3]  
Parmar P(2013)Predicting activites after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke 8 25-32
[4]  
Norrving B(1988)Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia Int J Rehabil Res 11 181-3
[5]  
Mensah GA(2004)Goal priorities identified by individuals with chronic stroke: Implications for rehabilitation professionals Physiother Canada 56 171-6
[6]  
Bennett DA(2005)Institutionalization after stroke Clin Rehabil 19 97-108
[7]  
Mukherjee D(1995)Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 27-32
[8]  
Patil CG(2006)Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: a prospective cohort study Clin Rehabil 20 262-8
[9]  
Kwakkel G(2013)A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy Crit Rev Biomed Eng 41 343-63
[10]  
Kollen BJ(2012)Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 48 111-21