In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration

被引:78
作者
Kasaj A. [1 ]
Reichert C. [1 ]
Götz H. [2 ]
Röhrig B. [3 ]
Smeets R. [4 ]
Willershausen B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[2] Institute of Applied Structure and Microanalysis, Medical Faculty, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[3] Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[4] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aachen University
关键词
Collagen Membrane; Gingival Fibroblast; Human Gingival Fibroblast; Guide Tissue Regeneration; Alamar Blue Assay;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-4-22
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Different types of bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with its ultimate goal of regenerating lost periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological effects of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes in cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and human osteoblast-like (HOB) cells in vitro. Methods. Three commercially available collagen membranes [TutoDent® (TD), Resodont® (RD) and BioGide® (BG)] as well as three nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes [ACE (AC), Cytoplast® (CT) and TefGen-FD® (TG)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. The effect of the barrier membranes on HGF, PDLF as well as HOB cells was assessed by the Alamar Blue fluorometric proliferation assay after 1, 2.5, 4, 24 and 48 h time periods. The structural and morphological properties of the membranes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. The results showed that of the six barriers tested, TD and RD demonstrated the highest rate of HGF proliferation at both earlier (1 h) and later (48 h) time periods (P < 0.001) compared to all other tested barriers and CD. Similarly, TD, RD and BG had significantly higher numbers of cells at all time periods when compared with the positive control in PDLF culture (P ≤; 0.001). In HOB cell culture, the highest rate of cell proliferation was also calculated for TD at all time periods (P < 0.001). SEM observations demonstrated a microporous structure of all collagen membranes, with a compact top surface and a porous bottom surface, whereas the nonresorbable PTFE membranes demonstrated a homogenous structure with a symmetric dense skin layer. Conclusion. Results from the present study suggested that GTR membrane materials, per se, may influence cell proliferation in the process of periodontal tissue/bone regeneration. Among the six membranes examined, the bioabsorbable membranes demonstrated to be more suitable to stimulate cellular proliferation compared to nonresorbable PTFE membranes. © 2008 Kasaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration
    Soldatos, Nikolaos K.
    Stylianou, Popi
    Koidou, Vasiliki P.
    Angelov, Nikola
    Yukna, Raymond
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 48 (02): : 131 - 147
  • [2] Soft tissue response to fenestration type defects in the gingiva treated with various barrier membranes for regeneration
    Dung, Shing-Zeng
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Lu, Hsein-Kun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 9 (02) : 136 - 143
  • [3] Adsorption and release kinetics of growth factors on barrier membranes for guided tissue/bone regeneration: A systematic review
    Caballe-Serrano, Jordi
    Abdeslam-Mohamed, Yusra
    Munar-Frau, Antonio
    Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    Miron, Richard
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 100 : 57 - 68
  • [4] Antibiotic-Loaded Polymeric Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone/Tissue Regeneration: A Mini-Review
    Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
    Vallecillo, Cristina
    Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
    Manzano-Moreno, Francisco-Javier
    Osorio, Raquel
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [5] Modifications of Polymeric Membranes Used in Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration
    Florjanski, Wojciech
    Orzeszek, Sylwia
    Olchowy, Anna
    Grychowska, Natalia
    Wieckiewicz, Wlodzimierz
    Malysa, Andrzej
    Smardz, Joanna
    Wieckiewicz, Mieszko
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [6] Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Di Raimondo, Riccardo
    Sanz-Esporrin, Javier
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Pla, Rafael
    Luengo, Fernando
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    Nunez, Javier
    Sanz, Mariano
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (04) : 2213 - 2227
  • [7] Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Riccardo Di Raimondo
    Javier Sanz-Esporrín
    Ignacio Sanz-Martin
    Rafael Plá
    Fernando Luengo
    Fabio Vignoletti
    Javier Nuñez
    Mariano Sanz
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 2213 - 2227
  • [8] In Vitro Analysis of Healing Properties of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) vs. Collagen Membranes in Guided Tissue Regeneration
    Kumar, B. Saravana
    Prajapati, Ushma H.
    Das, Neelam
    Latha, K. Vel
    Shah, Vishal S.
    Mohammadi, Arshiya F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2025, 17 (SUPPL 1) : S519 - S521
  • [9] Enhancing Guided Tissue Regeneration of Periodontal Defects by Using a Novel Perforated Barrier Membrane
    Gamal, Ahmed Y.
    Iacono, Vincent J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (07) : 905 - 913
  • [10] Physical, mechanical, and biological properties of collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro study
    Shi, Xiaolu
    Li, Xianjing
    Tian, Ye
    Qu, Xinyao
    Zhai, Shaobo
    Liu, Yang
    Jia, Wei
    Cui, Yan
    Chu, Shunli
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)