Molecular differences between younger versus older ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers

被引:0
作者
Tao Qing
Thomas Karn
Mariya Rozenblit
Julia Foldi
Michal Marczyk
Naing Lin Shan
Kim Blenman
Uwe Holtrich
Kevin Kalinsky
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Lajos Pusztai
机构
[1] Yale University,Breast Medical Oncology, School of Medicine
[2] Goethe-University Frankfurt,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[3] Silesian University of Technology,Department of Data Science and Engineering
[4] Emory University,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute
[5] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics
来源
npj Breast Cancer | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The RxPONDER and TAILORx trials demonstrated benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients age ≤ 50 with node-positive breast cancer and Recurrence Score (RS) 0–26, and in node-negative disease with RS 16–25, respectively, but no benefit in older women with the same clinical features. We analyzed transcriptomic and genomic data of ER+/HER2− breast cancers with in silico RS < 26 from TCGA (n = 530), two microarray cohorts (A: n = 865; B: n = 609), the METABRIC (n = 867), and the SCAN-B (n = 1636) datasets. There was no difference in proliferation-related gene expression between age groups. Older patients had higher mutation burden and more frequent ESR1 copy number gain, but lower frequency of GATA3 mutations. Younger patients had higher rate of ESR1 copy number loss. In all datasets, younger patients had significantly lower mRNA expression of ESR1 and ER-associated genes, and higher expression of immune-related genes. The ER- and immune-related gene signatures showed negative correlation and defined three subpopulations in younger women: immune-high/ER-low, immune-intermediate/ER-intermediate, and immune-low/ER-intermediate. We hypothesize that in immune-high cancers, the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy may drive the benefit, whereas in immune-low/ER-intermediate cancers chemotherapy induced ovarian suppression may play important role.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
DeSantis CE(2019)Breast cancer statistics, 2019 CA Cancer J. Clin. 69 438-451
[2]  
Burstein HJ(2016)Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on ovarian suppression J. Clin. Oncol. 34 1689-1701
[3]  
Sparano JA(2018)Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 379 111-121
[4]  
Piccart M(2021)70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age Lancet Oncol. 22 476-488
[5]  
Broekmans FJ(2007)Female reproductive ageing: Current knowledge and future trends Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 18 58-65
[6]  
Knauff EA(1983)Estimation of the distribution of age at natural menopause from prevalence data Am. J. Epidemiol. 117 356-361
[7]  
te Velde ER(2017)The correlation of age with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure in breast cancer patients Oncotarget 8 11372-11379
[8]  
Macklon NS(2021)Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure in young women with early breast cancer: Prospective analysis of four randomised neoadjuvant/adjuvant breast cancer trials Eur. J. Cancer 152 193-203
[9]  
Fauser BC(2021)NRG Oncology/NSABP B-47 menstrual history study: Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy with and without trastuzumab NPJ Breast Cancer 7 436-446
[10]  
Krailo MD(2015)Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 372 2221-2231