Expressive suppression as an obstacle to social change: Linking system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action

被引:0
作者
Nevin Solak
Maya Tamir
Nebi Sümer
John T. Jost
Eran Halperin
机构
[1] TED University,Department of Psychology
[2] The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,undefined
[3] Sabancı University,undefined
[4] New York University,undefined
来源
Motivation and Emotion | 2021年 / 45卷
关键词
System justification; Emotion regulation; Expressive suppression; System-based anger; Collective guilt; Collective action;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research on system justification theory suggests that justifying the societal status quo decreases negative emotions, leading to less collective action. In this investigation, we propose that the degree to which negative emotions mediate the link between system justification and collective action may depend upon whether individuals tend to suppress the expression of their negative emotions. We tested this hypothesis in the diverse socio-political contexts of Turkey, Israel, and the U.S. In one correlational study (Study 1) and three experimental studies (Studies 2–4), we observed that the link between system justification and willingness to participate in collective action through anger (Studies 1–2 and 4) and guilt (Study 3) was moderated by expressive suppression. We found that negative emotions mediated the association between system justification and collective action among those who suppress the expression of their emotions less frequently, but not those who use expressive suppression more frequently. These findings suggest that emotion regulation may undermine, rather than facilitate, efforts to engage in collective action even among people who are low in system justification.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 682
页数:21
相关论文
共 235 条
[1]  
Abu Hein F(1993)Trauma and mental health of children in Gaza British Medical Journal 306 1130-1131
[2]  
Qouta S(2013)The future of emotion regulation research: Capturing context Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 155-172
[3]  
Thabet AA(2015)Putting emotion regulation in context Current Opinion in Psychology 3 100-107
[4]  
El Sarraj E(2000)Culpable control and the psychology of blame Psychological Bulletin 126 556-574
[5]  
Aldao A(2017)“Making America great again”: System justification in the US presidential election of 2016 Translational Issues in Psychological Science 3 231-240
[6]  
Aldao A(2011)Effects of legitimizing discrimination against homosexuals on gay bashing European Journal of Social Psychology 40 1-9
[7]  
Tull MT(2012)Virtual special issue on theory and research on collective action European Journal of Social Psychology 42 19-23
[8]  
Alicke MD(2011)Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 62-77
[9]  
Azevedo F(2002)The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment Journal of Applied Psychology 87 230-242
[10]  
Jost JT(2019)Rumination about discrimination mediates the unique association between anger and collective action intentions Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 87 312-326