Parental socioeconomic status and adolescent health in Japan

被引:0
作者
Shohei Okamoto
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology,Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health
[2] National Centre for Global Health and Medicine,Institute for Global Health Policy Research
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is no consensus on which parental socioeconomic indicators should be used to define adolescents’ socioeconomic status (SES). Utilising the data for 3154 parent-adolescent pairs obtained from the sample of the Survey of Lifestyle Value of Parents and Children 2011 conducted by the Cabinet Office in Japan, the associations between adolescent’s subjective economic status, parental SES (i.e. education, occupation, and household income), and child health-related outcomes (i.e. self-rated health, dietary and oral health behaviours) were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression to investigate heterogeneity in these relationships across SES indicators and health outcome measures. Results demonstrated that income was the strongest predictor of adolescent health outcomes, suggesting that adolescents in the middle- or high-income groups tended to report better health status compared to the low-income group, have a higher frequency of having breakfast, and more likely to regularly brush their teeth by 24% (OR 1.24, 95% CI [1.06–1.46]) to 66% (OR 1.66, 95% CI [1.30–2.12]). Parental education was also related to child health-related behaviours, with higher levels of habitual healthy behaviours being observed in the middle- and high-education groups than in the low-education group by 15% (OR 1.15, 95% CI [1.01–1.32]) to 63% (OR 1.63, 95% CI [1.31–2.03]). Future studies regarding health disparities among children/adolescents should carefully choose an SES indicator, taking multiple pathways between each SES indicator and health/health behaviours into consideration.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Galobardes B(2008)Is the association between childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality established? Update of a systematic review J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62 387-390
[2]  
Lynch JW(1999)Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status J. Econ. Perspect. 13 145-166
[3]  
Smith GD(2004)Preventing long-term welfare receipt: The theoretical relationship between health and poverty over the early life course Soc. Sci. Med. 59 2285-2301
[4]  
Smith JP(2002)A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives Int. J. Epidemiol. 31 285-293
[5]  
Nielsen MJ(2003)Life course epidemiology J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57 778-783
[6]  
Juon HS(2005)Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review BMC Public Health 230 37-48
[7]  
Ensminger M(2019)Intergenerational income mobility and health in Japan: A quasi-experimental approach Soc. Sci. Med. 44 809-819
[8]  
Ben-Shlomo Y(1997)Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse Soc. Sci. Med. 303 1159-1166
[9]  
Kuh D(2010)Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality JAMA 31 535-554
[10]  
Kuh D(2007)The intergenerational transmission of poverty in industrialized countries SSRN J. 92 1308-1334