Accurately predicting the risk of unfavorable outcomes after endovascular coil therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an interpretable machine learning model

[1] Etminan N(2019)Worldwide incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to region, time period, blood pressure, and smoking prevalence in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA Neurol 76 588-597

[2] Chang H-S(2019)Aneurysm characteristics, study population, and endovascular techniques for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a large, prospective, multicenter cohort: results of the analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm study AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40 517-523

[3] Hackenberg K(2013)Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status Stroke 44 2046-2054

[4] Gawlitza M(2020)Advances in endovascular aneurysm management: coiling and adjunctive devices Stroke Vasc Neurol 5 14-21

[5] Soize S(2002)International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial Lancet 360 1267-1274

[6] Barbe C(2018)Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study BMJ 360 j5745-909

[7] Pierot L(2014)The SAH score: a comprehensive communication tool J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 23 902-844

[8] Wakhloo AK(2019)Prediction of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage Stroke 50 837-1737

[9] Campos JK(2021)Predicting the poor recovery risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical evaluation and management based on a new predictive nomogram Clin Neurol Neurosurg 200 106302-340

[10] Lien BV(2012)Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke 43 1711-E764

[1] Etminan N(2019)Worldwide incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage according to region, time period, blood pressure, and smoking prevalence in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA Neurol 76 588-597

[2] Chang H-S(2019)Aneurysm characteristics, study population, and endovascular techniques for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a large, prospective, multicenter cohort: results of the analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm study AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40 517-523

[3] Hackenberg K(2013)Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status Stroke 44 2046-2054

[4] Gawlitza M(2020)Advances in endovascular aneurysm management: coiling and adjunctive devices Stroke Vasc Neurol 5 14-21

[5] Soize S(2002)International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial Lancet 360 1267-1274

[6] Barbe C(2018)Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study BMJ 360 j5745-909

[7] Pierot L(2014)The SAH score: a comprehensive communication tool J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 23 902-844

[8] Wakhloo AK(2019)Prediction of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage Stroke 50 837-1737

[9] Campos JK(2021)Predicting the poor recovery risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical evaluation and management based on a new predictive nomogram Clin Neurol Neurosurg 200 106302-340

[10] Lien BV(2012)Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke 43 1711-E764