Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up

被引：7

作者：

Lee G.W. ^{[1
]}

Jang S.-J. ^{[2
]}

Shin S.M. ^{[1
]}

Jang J.-H. ^{[2
]}

Kim J.-D. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Armed Forces Yangju Hospital

[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kosin University, Gospel Hospital, Seo-gu, Busan 602-702

来源：

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | 2014年 / 24卷 / Suppl 1期

关键词：

Conventional; Decompression; Lumbar spine; Spinal stenosis; Tubular retractor;

D O I：

10.1007/s00590-013-1287-x

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Satisfactory short- and mid-term results have been observed following microscopic decompression with tubular retractor (MDT) and conventional microscopic decompression (CMD) in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). It is not yet clear which surgical procedure is the optimal treatment for LSS, especially in long-term follow-up period. To the best of our knowledge, there is no comparative study analyzing the clinical-radiological outcomes of MDT and CMD over a 10-year follow-up periods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiological outcomes of MDT and CMD over a 10-year follow-up period in patients with LSS. Of total 121 patients, 102 patients (53 MDT and 49 CMD) were followed for at least 10 years following MDT and CMD for LSS. We retrospectively reviewed surgical results and clinical outcomes based on the visual analogue scale, McNab's criteria, and the Oswestry Disability Index, and radiological analysis results with the parameters, including the change of disk height and intervertebral distance, obtained preoperatively and 3- and 6-month, and 1-, 6-, and 10-year postoperatively. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups. Five patients (two in MDT, three in CMD) required re-operation for re-stenotic change of the affected segment. The number of patients requiring re-operation was not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in a long-term follow-up period after a 3-month follow-up (p > 0.05). However, in the acute postoperative phase of <3-month postoperatively, MDT appears to result in less postoperative pain and better clinical outcomes compared with the CMD. In conclusion, despite relatively small sample size with retrospective design, our study suggested that MDT appears to result in less postoperative pain and better clinical outcomes in the acute postoperative period of <3 months, but both MDT and CMD were no significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes after that time. © 2013 Springer-Verlag France.

引用

页码：S145 / S151

页数：6

共 20 条

[1]

Oppenheimer J.H., Decastro I., McDonnell D.E., Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: A historical review, Neurosurg Focus, 27, (2009)

[2]

Guiot B.H., Khoo L.T., Fessler R.G., A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27, pp. 432-438, (2002)

[3]

Iguchi T., Kurihara A., Nakayama J., Sato K., Kurosaka M., Yamasaki K., Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, pp. 1754-1759, (2000)

[4]

Carreon L.Y., Puno R.M., Dimar I.I.J.R., Glassman S.D., Johnson J.R., Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, pp. 2089-2092, (2003)

[5]

Porter R.W., Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 21, pp. 2046-2052, (1996)

[6]

Asgarzadie F., Khoo L.T., Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: Overview of early and long-term outcomes, Orthop Clin North Am, 38, pp. 387-399, (2007)

[7]

Khoo L.T., Fessler R.G., Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis, Neurosurgery, 51, (2002)

[8]

Javid M.J., Hadar E.J., Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: A prospective study, J Neurosurg, 89, pp. 1-7, (1998)

[9]

Turner J.A., Ersek M., Herron L., Deyo R., Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 17, pp. 1-8, (1992)

[10]

Aryanpur J., Ducker T., Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: An alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis, Neurosurgery, 26, pp. 429-433, (1990)

← 1 2 →