Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics

被引:74
作者
Elia I. [1 ,2 ]
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M. [2 ,3 ]
Kolovou A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Educational Research and Evaluation, Cyprus Pedagogical Institute, 2252 Nicosia
[2] Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, 3561 GE Utrecht
[3] IQB, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin
来源
ZDM | 2009年 / 41卷 / 5期
关键词
Inter-task strategy flexibility; Intra-task strategy flexibility; Non-routine problem solving; Strategy use;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many researchers have investigated flexibility of strategies in various mathematical domains. This study investigates strategy use and strategy flexibility, as well as their relations with performance in non-routine problem solving. In this context, we propose and investigate two types of strategy flexibility, namely inter-task flexibility (changing strategies across problems) and intra-task flexibility (changing strategies within problems). Data were collected on three non-routine problems from 152 Dutch students in grade 4 (age 9-10) with high mathematics scores. Findings showed that students rarely applied heuristic strategies in solving the problems. Among these strategies, the trial-and-error strategy was found to have a general potential to lead to success. The two types of flexibility were not displayed to a large extent in students' strategic behavior. However, on the one hand, students who showed inter-task strategy flexibility were more successful than students who persevered with the same strategy. On the other hand, contrary to our expectations, intra-task strategy flexibility did not support the students in reaching the correct answer. This stemmed from the construction of an incomplete mental representation of the problems by the students. Findings are discussed and suggestions for further research are made. © FIZ Karlsruhe 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 618
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Altun M., Sezgin-Memnun D., Mathematics teacher trainees' skills and opinions on solving non-routine mathematical problems, Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4, 2, pp. 213-238, (2008)
  • [2] Baroody A.J., The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge, The development of arithmetic concepts and skills, pp. 1-34, (2003)
  • [3] Beishuizen M., van Putten C.M., van Mulken F., Mental arithmetic and strategy use with indirect number problems up to one hundred, Learning and Instruction, 7, 1, pp. 87-106, (1997)
  • [4] Bodin A., Coutourier R., Gras R., CHIC: Classification Hiérarchique Implicative et Cohésive-Version sous Windows-CHIC 1.2, (2000)
  • [5] Cai J., Singaporean students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34, pp. 719-737, (2003)
  • [6] Carlson M., Bloom I., The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework, Educational Studies inMathematics, 58, pp. 45-75, (2005)
  • [7] Charles R., Lester F., O'Daffer P., How to evaluate progress in problem solving, (1992)
  • [8] de Bock D., Verschaffel L., Janssens D., The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students' solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, pp. 65-83, (1998)
  • [9] de Corte E., Learning from instruction: The case of mathematics, Learning Inquiry, 1, pp. 19-30, (2007)
  • [10] Demetriou A., Mind intelligence and development: A cognitive, differential, and developmental theory of intelligence, Developmental change: Theories, models and measurement, pp. 21-73, (2004)