National and regional prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in India: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

被引：22

作者：

Mantri, Neha ^{[1
]}

Goel, Akhil Dhanesh ^{[2
]}

Patel, Mamta ^{[1
]}

Baskaran, Pritish ^{[2
]}

Dutta, Gitashree ^{[2
]}

Gupta, Manoj Kumar ^{[2
]}

Yadav, Vikas ^{[3
]}

Mittal, Madhukar ^{[4
]}

Shekhar, Shashank ^{[5
]}

Bhardwaj, Pankaj ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] AIIMS, Sch Publ Hlth, Jodhpur, India

[2] AIIMS, Dept Community Med & Family Med, Jodhpur, India

[3] ICMR NIREH, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

[4] AIIMS, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Jodhpur, India

[5] AIIMS, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jodhpur, India

[6] AIIMS, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Med & Family Med, Acad Head, Jodhpur, India

来源：

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期

关键词：

Gestational diabetes mellitus; Pregnancy complications; Diagnosis; IADPSG; Glucose tolerance test; DIPSI; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; RISK-FACTORS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; PLASMA-GLUCOSE; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; CAPILLARY;

D O I：

10.1186/s12889-024-18024-9

中图分类号：

R1 [预防医学、卫生学];

学科分类号：

1004 ; 120402 ;

摘要：

BackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is frequently misdiagnosed during pregnancy. There is an abundance of evidence, but little is known regarding the regional prevalence estimates of GDM in India. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide valuable insights into the national and regional prevalence of GDM among pregnant women in India.MethodsWe conducted an initial article search on PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ShodhGanga searches to identify quantitative research papers (database inception till 15th June,2022). This review included prevalence studies that estimated the occurrence of GDM across different states in India.ResultsTwo independent reviewers completed the screening of 2393 articles, resulting in the identification of 110 articles that met the inclusion criteria, which collectively provided 117 prevalence estimates. Using a pooled estimate calculation (with an Inverse square heterogeneity model), the pooled prevalence of GDM in pregnant women was estimated to be 13%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 9 to 16%.. In India, Diabetes in Pregnancy Study of India (DIPSI) was the most common diagnostic criteria used, followed by International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and World Health Organization (WHO) 1999. It was observed that the rural population has slightly less prevalence of GDM at 10.0% [6.0-13.0%, I2=96%] when compared to the urban population where the prevalence of GDM was 12.0% [9.0-16.0%, I2 = 99%].ConclusionsThis review emphasizes the lack of consensus in screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), leading to varied prevalence rates across Indian states. It thoroughly examines the controversies regarding GDM screening by analyzing population characteristics, geographic variations, diagnostic criteria agreement, screening timing, fasting vs. non-fasting approaches, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility, offering valuable recommendations for policy makers. By fostering the implementation of state-wise screening programs, it can contribute to improving maternal and neonatal outcomes and promoting healthier pregnancies across the country.

引用

页数：25

共 88 条

[21] Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) [J].