Understanding the importance of sexism in shaping climate denial and policy opposition

被引:0
|
作者
Salil Benegal
Mirya R. Holman
机构
[1] DePauw University,
[2] Tulane University,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2021年 / 167卷
关键词
Climate change; Sexism; System justification; Surveys; Policy views; Climate denial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the USA, a sizable share of the population denies the human causes of climate change and opposes policies to address it. System justification, where individuals fight to protect a socio-economic order, undergirds this opposition. We argue that sexism, representing an investment in gendered hierarchies, contributes to climate change denial and policy opposition. Using nationally representative surveys from 2016 to 2018, we show a consistent relationship between sexism and opposition to climate change beliefs and policies. These results are consistent across measures of both climate change beliefs and support for climate policy. We then show that sexism is correlated with climate denial and opposition to climate policy within a wide variety of subgroups of interest: for both Democrats and Republicans and for groups sorted by ideology, gender, education, and age. We then extend our analysis back in time, looking at data from 2012, finding similar effects prior to the 2016 election. The consistent findings point to the central role that system justifying beliefs about gender play in shaping attitudes about climate change in the USA.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy
    Pidgeon, Nick
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2012, 12 : S85 - S106
  • [22] The animal agriculture industry, US universities, and the obstruction of climate understanding and policy
    Morris, Viveca
    Jacquet, Jennifer
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2024, 177 (03)
  • [23] The animal agriculture industry, US universities, and the obstruction of climate understanding and policy
    Viveca Morris
    Jennifer Jacquet
    Climatic Change, 2024, 177
  • [24] Global Climate Change and Local Action: Understanding the Connecticut Policy Trajectory
    Boyer, Mark A.
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 14 (01) : 79 - 107
  • [25] Coping with uncertainty in climate policy making: (Mis)understanding scenario studies
    Enserink, Bert
    Kwakkel, Jan H.
    Veenman, Sietske
    FUTURES, 2013, 53 : 1 - 12
  • [26] Clearing the air: the contribution of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States
    Fletcher, Amy Lynn
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 18 (05) : 800 - 816
  • [27] Deeper understanding of the barriers to national climate adaptation policy: the case of South Korea
    Lee, Seunghan
    Paavola, Jouni
    Dessai, Suraje
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [28] Parliamentarizing a Politicized Policy: Understanding the Involvement of the European Parliament in UN Climate Negotiations
    Delreux, Tom
    Burns, Charlotte
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 7 (03): : 339 - 349
  • [29] Deeper understanding of the barriers to national climate adaptation policy: the case of South Korea
    Seunghan Lee
    Jouni Paavola
    Suraje Dessai
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2023, 28
  • [30] The importance of health co-benefits under different climate policy cooperation frameworks
    Scovronick, Noah
    Anthoff, David
    Dennig, Francis
    Errickson, Frank
    Ferranna, Maddalena
    Peng, Wei
    Spears, Dean
    Wagner, Fabian
    Budolfson, Mark
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (05)