The influence of various forms of co-authorship on the scientific productivity of Russian scientists in the field of molecular biology

被引：3
作者：
Mokhnacheva Y.V. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Library for Natural Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino
来源：
Scientific and Technical Information Processing | 2015年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词：
articles; bibliometrics; citation levels; co-authorship; molecular biology; reviews; science in Russia; scientific collaboration; scientific productivity;
D O I：
10.3103/S0147688215030090
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This paper considers the influence of different forms of co-authorship as the main aspect of collaboration in science on the productivity of Russian scientists in the field of molecular biology. We attempt to confirm or refute assumptions about the impacts of different forms of co-authorship on improvement of the citation rates of publications, viz., the number of co-authoring scientists, the number of co-authoring organizations, and international co-authorship. Trends in the dynamics of proportional redistribution of articles and reviews as types of publications in document flows and the impacts of these processes on the citation levels of publications are analyzed. The information base of this study is the Web of Science Core Collection (Thomson Reuters). © 2015, Allerton Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码：162 / 172
页数：10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Franceschet M., Costantini A., The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers, J. Informetrics, 4, pp. 540-553, (2010)
  • [2] Katz J.S., Martin B.R., What is research collaboration?, Res. Policy, 26, 1, pp. 1-18, (1997)
  • [3] Merton R.K., The Matthew Effect in science, Science, 159, 3810, pp. 56-63, (1968)
  • [4] Sonnenwald D.H., Scientific collaboration, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 41, 1, pp. 643-681, (2007)
  • [5] Cronin B., Shaw D., Barre K.L., A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 54, 9, pp. 855-871, (2003)
  • [6] Lariviere V., Gingras Y., Archambault E., Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities, Scientometrics, 68, 3, pp. 519-533, (2006)
  • [7] Moody J., The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999, Am. Soc. Rev., 69, 2, pp. 213-238, (2004)
  • [8] Persson O., Glanzel W., Danell R., Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies, Scientometrics, 60, 3, pp. 421-432, (2004)
  • [9] Wagner-Doebler R., Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 from a bibliometric point of view, Scientometrics, 52, 3, pp. 503-517, (2001)
  • [10] Beaver D.B., Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?, Scientometrics, 60, 3, pp. 399-408, (2004)
123