Co-current crossflow microfiltration in a microchannel

被引:0
作者
Levy I. Amar
Michael I. Hill
Monica Faria
Daniela Guisado
Cees J. M. van Rijn
Edward F. Leonard
机构
[1] Columbia University,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] Columbia University,Department of Chemical Engineering
[3] Wageningen University Stippeneng,MicroFluidics and NanoTechnology/ORC
来源
Biomedical Microdevices | 2019年 / 21卷
关键词
Cross-flow; Microfluidics; Microfiltration model; Constant transmembrane pressure; Microsieve; Sieve; Nanopores; Blood; Erythrocytes; Plasma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Steady state crossflow microfiltration (CMF) is an important and often necessary means of particle separation and concentration for both industrial and biomedical processes. The factors controlling the performance of CMF have been extensively reviewed. A major factor is transmembrane pressure (TMP). Because microchannels have small height, they tend to have high pressure gradients in the feed-flow direction. In the extreme, these gradients may even reverse the pressure across the membrane (inciting backflow). It is therefore desirable to compensate for the effect of feed-flow on the TMP, aiming at constant transmembrane pressure (cTMP) at a value which maximizes filtrate flux. This is especially critical during filtration of deformable particles (e.g. erythrocytes) through low intrinsic resistance membranes. Filtration flux is generally taken to be directly proportional to TMP, with pressure drop along the channel decreasing in the flow direction. A co-current flow of filtrate in a suitably designed filtrate collecting channel is shown to allow the TMP to remain constant and permit the sieving surface to perform optimally, permitting up to twice as much filtration over that of a naïve configuration. Manipulation of the filtrate channel may be even more beneficial if it prevents backflow that might otherwise occur at the end of a sufficiently long channel. Experiments with erythrocyte suspensions, reported here, validate these concepts.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Amar LI(2018)Erythrocyte fouling on micro-engineered membranes Biomed. Microdevices 20 55-492
[2]  
Guisado D(2006)Membrane processes in biotechnology: An overview Biotechnol. Adv. 24 482-1102
[3]  
Faria M(2012)A scalable, micropore, platelet rich plasma separation device Biomed. Microdevices 14 1095-3224
[4]  
Charcosset C(1991)Lateral inertial migration of a small sphere in fast laminar flow through a membrane duct Chem. Eng. Sci. 46 3219-272
[5]  
Dickson M(1995)Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling J. Membr. Sci. 100 259-257
[6]  
Amar L(2008)Silicon-based microfilters for whole blood cell separation Biomed. Microdevices 10 251-79
[7]  
Hill M(2005)Suspension flow model for hydrodynamics and concentration polarisation in crossflow microfiltration J. Membr. Sci. 253 67-217
[8]  
Schwartz J(1984)The deposition of rejected matter in membrane separation processes Chem. Eng. Commun. 30 209-3084
[9]  
Leonard E(1992)Cross-flow cake filtration mechanisms and kinetics Chem. Eng. Sci. 47 3067-208
[10]  
Drew DA(2015)Development of a microfluidic device for cell concentration and blood cell-plasma separation Biomed. Microdevices 17 115-7