Neurosurgical education in Europe and the United States of America

被引:0
作者
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
Pascal O. Zinn
Oliver Bozinov
Rivka R. Colen
Helmut Bertalanffy
Ekkehard M. Kasper
机构
[1] University Hospital,Department of Neurosurgery
[2] University of Zurich,Regenerative Medicine Program, Department of Surgical Research
[3] University Hospital Zurich,Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
[4] Harvard Medical School,Department of Radiology
[5] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Genomic Stability and DNA Repair, Dana
[6] Harvard Medical School,Farber Cancer Institute
来源
Neurosurgical Review | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Neurosurgery; Education; Residency; Curriculum; United States; Europe;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Training in neurological surgery is one of the most competitive and demanding specializations in medicine. It therefore demands careful planning in both the scientific and clinical neurosurgery arena to finally turn out physicians that can be clinically sound and scientifically competitive. National and international training and career options are pointed out, based on the available relevant literature, with the objective of comparing the neurosurgical training in Europe and the USA. Despite clear European Association of Neurosurgical Societies guidelines, every country in Europe maintains its own board requirements, which is reflected in an institutional curriculum that is specific to the professional society of that particular country. In contrast, the residency program in the USA is required to comply with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education guidelines. Rather similar guidelines exist for the education of neurosurgical residents in the USA and Europe; their translation into the practical hospital setting and the resulting clinical lifestyle of a resident diverges enormously. Since neurosurgical education remains heterogeneous worldwide, we argue that a more standardized curriculum across different nations would greatly facilitate the interaction of different centers, allow a direct comparison of available services, and support the exchange of vital information for quality control and future improvements. Furthermore, the exchange of residents between different training centers may improve education by increasing their knowledge base, both technically as well as intellectually.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 417
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Anwar M(2005)EWTD has negative impact on training for surgeons BMJ 331 1476-584
[2]  
Irfan S(2005)Economic factors and the percentage of residency positions filled by United States medical graduates Obstet Gynecol 106 581-386
[3]  
Daly N(2008)The future of neurosurgery: a white paper on the recruitment and retention of women in neurosurgery J Neurosurg 109 378-403
[4]  
Amen F(2005)Resident duty hours reform: results of a national survey of the program directors and residents in neurosurgery training programs Neurosurgery 56 398-931
[5]  
Barbieri RL(2004)Resident duty hours in American neurosurgery Neurosurgery 54 925-S281
[6]  
Anastos L(2006)Training residents in endovascular neurosurgery Neurosurgery 59 S277-88
[7]  
Michels KB(1996)Educating neurosurgeons for the 21st century Neurosurg Q. 62 78-14
[8]  
Benzil DL(2004)Competency-based training in neurosurgery: the next revolution in medical education Surg Neurol 61 5-1212
[9]  
Abosch A(2005)Neurosurgical residency in the United States: a trainee’s experience Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147 1211-297
[10]  
Germano I(2005)The European working time directive: one for all and all for one? Surgery 137 293-16