Dishonesty and research misconduct within the medical profession

被引:0
作者
Habib Rahman
Stephen Ankier
机构
[1] Specialist Registrar in Cardiology and General Medicine,
[2] NHS,undefined
[3] Independent Pharmaceutical Consultant,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Ethics | / 21卷
关键词
Scientific reproducibility; Medical ethics; History of medicine; Royal College of Physicians; Sociology of the medical profession;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While there has been much discussion of how the scientific establishment’s culture can engender research misconduct and scientific irreproducibility, this has been discussed much less frequently with respect to the medical profession. Here the authors posit that a lack of self-criticism, an encouragement of novel scientific research generated by the recruitment policies of the UK Royal Training Colleges along with insufficient training in the sciences are core reasons as to why research misconduct and dishonesty prevail within the medical community. Furthermore, the UK General Medical Council’s own data demonstrates a historic inattentiveness to the ease with which doctors can engage in research misconduct. Suggestions are made as to how these issues can be investigated and alternative incentives for career advancement are adumbrated.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Siegel D(2010)Battling the paper glut Science. 329 1466-688
[2]  
Baveye P(2016)Watch out for cheats in citation game Nature. 535 201-237
[3]  
Biagioli M(2019)GP partner is struck off for dishonesty in research BMJ. 364 l692-606
[4]  
Dyer C(2012)Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science Perspect Psychol Sci 7 670-1555
[5]  
Stroebe W(2017)Just over half of doctors declare fees from drug companies BMJ. 356 j1574-688
[6]  
Postmes T(2006)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well J R Soc Med 99 232-324
[7]  
Spears R(2005)Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies PLoS Med 2 e138-85
[8]  
Torjesen I(2010)Enlightened physicians: setting out on an elite academic career in the second half of the eighteenth century Bull Hist Med 84 578-396
[9]  
Smith R(1995)Consultant struck off for fraudulent claims BMJ. 310 1554-346
[10]  
Smith R(1995)UK royal college responds to scientific fraud Lancet. 345 1566-284