Recommendations from an International Consensus Conference on the Current Status and Future of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Manfred Kaufmann
Gunter von Minckwitz
Elefhterios P. Mamounas
David Cameron
Lisa A. Carey
Massimo Cristofanilli
Carsten Denkert
Wolfgang Eiermann
Michael Gnant
Jay R. Harris
Thomas Karn
Cornelia Liedtke
Davide Mauri
Roman Rouzier
Eugen Ruckhaeberle
Vladimir Semiglazov
W. Fraser Symmans
Andrew Tutt
Lajos Pusztai
机构
[1] Goethe University,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Breast Unit
[2] German Breast Group,Edinburgh Cancer Research Center
[3] Aultman Cancer Center,Division of Hematology
[4] University of Edinburgh,Oncology
[5] University of North Carolina,Department of Medical Oncology
[6] Fox Chase Cancer Center,Institute of Pathology
[7] University Hospital Charité,Women’s Hospital
[8] Red Cross Clinics,Department of Surgery
[9] Medical University of Vienna,Department of Radiation Oncology
[10] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[11] Harvard Medical School,Department of Medical Oncology
[12] University Hospital Muenster,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[13] General Hospital of Lamia,Department of Pathology
[14] Hôpital Tenon,Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit
[15] N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology,Department of Medical Oncology
[16] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
[17] Guy’s Hospital Campus,undefined
[18] King’s College London School of Medicine,undefined
[19] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2012年 / 19卷
关键词
Breast Cancer; Trastuzumab; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Inflammatory Breast Cancer; Prophylactic Contralateral Mastectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for the treatment of primary breast cancer has constantly increased, especially in trials of new therapeutic regimens. In the 1980 s, NST was shown to substantially improve breast-conserving surgery rates and was first typically used for patients with inoperable locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. Investigators have since also used NST as an in vivo test for chemosensitivity by assessing pathologic complete response. Today, by using pathologic response and other biomarkers as intermediate end points, results from trials of new regimens and therapies that use NST are aimed to precede and anticipate the results from larger adjuvant trials. In 2003, a panel of representatives from various breast cancer clinical research groups was first convened in Biedenkopf to formulate recommendations on the use of NST. The obtained consensus was updated in two subsequent meetings in 2004 and 2006. The most recent conference on recommendations on the use of NST took place in 2010 and forms the basis of this report.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1516
页数:8
相关论文
共 213 条
[1]  
Kaufmann M(2007)Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives, 2006 Ann Oncol. 18 1927-1934
[2]  
von Minckwitz G(2006)Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update J Clin Oncol. 24 1940-1949
[3]  
Bear HD(2011)The neoadjuvant approach in breast cancer treatment: it is not just about chemotherapy anymore Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 23 31-36
[4]  
Kaufmann M(2011)For the GBG and AGO-B Study Groups. Correlation of various pathologic complete response (pCR) definitions with long-term outcome and the prognostic value of pCR in various breast cancer subtypes: results from the German neoadjuvant meta-analysis J Clin Oncol 29 1028-699
[5]  
Hortobagyi GN(2010)Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features Breast Cancer Res Treat. 124 689-1582
[6]  
Goldhirsch A(2011)Biedenkopf Expert Panel Members. Use of standard markers and incorporation of molecular markers into breast cancer therapy Cancer. 117 1575-375
[7]  
Caudle AS(2010)Inflammatory breast cancer CA Cancer J Clin. CA Cancer J Clin. 60 351-1611
[8]  
Hunt KK(2009)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation Ann Surg Oncol. 16 1606-470
[9]  
Von Minckwitz G(2006)Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer Ann Surg. 244 464-330
[10]  
Kaufmann M(2010)Molecular subtypes and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer Oncology. 79 324-140