Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected

[1] Dibble EH(2018)Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion Eur Radiol 28 3-10

[2] Lourenco AP(2015)Architectural distortion on mammography: correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy AJR Am J Roentgenol 205 1339-1345

[3] Baird GL(2008)Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings Eur Radiol 18 2817-2825

[4] Ward RC(2015)Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings Breast J 21 538-542

[5] Maynard AS(2013)Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3d-tomosynthesis system Breast J 19 4-9

[6] Mainiero MB(2014)Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience Am J Roentgenol 203 216-222

[7] Bahl M(2017)Pathologic outcomes of architectural distortion on digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography Am J Roentgenol 209 1162-1167

[8] Baker JA(2018)Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography Radiology 288 38-46

[9] Kinsey EN(2016)Breast MR imaging for equivocal mammographic findings: help or hindrance? Radiographics 36 943-956

[10] Ghate SV(2016)MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography Diagn Interv Radiol 22 141-150

[1] Dibble EH(2018)Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion Eur Radiol 28 3-10

[2] Lourenco AP(2015)Architectural distortion on mammography: correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy AJR Am J Roentgenol 205 1339-1345

[3] Baird GL(2008)Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings Eur Radiol 18 2817-2825

[4] Ward RC(2015)Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings Breast J 21 538-542

[5] Maynard AS(2013)Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3d-tomosynthesis system Breast J 19 4-9

[6] Mainiero MB(2014)Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience Am J Roentgenol 203 216-222

[7] Bahl M(2017)Pathologic outcomes of architectural distortion on digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography Am J Roentgenol 209 1162-1167

[8] Baker JA(2018)Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography Radiology 288 38-46

[9] Kinsey EN(2016)Breast MR imaging for equivocal mammographic findings: help or hindrance? Radiographics 36 943-956

[10] Ghate SV(2016)MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography Diagn Interv Radiol 22 141-150