Conceptual review on scientific reasoning and scientific thinking

被引:0
|
作者
Carlos Díaz
Birgit Dorner
Heinrich Hussmann
Jan-Willem Strijbos
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Department of Psychology
[2] Aarhus University,Interacting Minds Centre
[3] Katholische Stiftungshochschule München,Department of Social Work
[4] Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Media Informatics Group
[5] University of Groningen,Department of Educational Sciences
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Scientific reasoning; Scientific thinking; Thinking; Reasoning; Concept review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When conducting a systematic analysis of the concept of scientific reasoning (SR), we found confusion regarding the definition of the concept, its characteristics and its blurred boundaries with the concept of scientific thinking (ST). Furthermore, some authors use the concepts as synonyms. These findings raised three issues we aimed to answer in the present study: (1) are SR and ST the same concept, (2) if not, what are the differences between them, and (3) how can SR and ST be characterised and operationalised for systematic research? We conducted a conceptual review using an integrative approach to analyse 166 texts. First, we found that thinking and reasoning might refer to different processes. Likewise, SR and ST can be characterised as distinct concepts. Furthermore, the review identified that differences found between the concepts of SR and ST are grounded in ontological and epistemological perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:4313 / 4325
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scientific reasoning ability does not predict scientific views on evolution among religious individuals
    Manwaring K.F.
    Jensen J.L.
    Gill R.A.
    Sudweeks R.R.
    Davies R.S.
    Bybee S.M.
    Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2018, 11 (1)
  • [42] Assessment of scientific reasoning: The effects of task context, data, and design on student reasoning in control of variables
    Zhou, Shaona
    Han, Jing
    Koenig, Kathleen
    Raplinger, Amy
    Pi, Yuan
    Li, Dan
    Xiao, Hua
    Fu, Zhao
    Bao, Lei
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2016, 19 : 175 - 187
  • [43] Tracing Young Children's Scientific Reasoning
    Russell Tytler
    Suzanne Peterson
    Research in Science Education, 2003, 33 : 433 - 465
  • [44] Development of a 'universal' rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing
    Timmerman, Briana E. Crotwell
    Strickland, Denise C.
    Johnson, Robert L.
    Payne, John R.
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (05) : 509 - 547
  • [45] Children's scientific reasoning in the context of bilingualism
    Kempert, Sebastian
    Hardy, Ilonca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2015, 19 (06) : 646 - 664
  • [46] The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view
    Lawson A.E.
    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2004, 2 (3) : 307 - 338
  • [47] The linguistic nature of Children's scientific reasoning
    Van de Sande, E.
    Kleemans, T.
    Verhoeven, L.
    Segers, E.
    LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2019, 62 : 20 - 26
  • [48] Knowledge Argument: Scientific Reasoning and the Explanatory Gap
    Rogério Gerspacher
    Axiomathes, 2018, 28 : 63 - 71
  • [49] Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories
    Gjoneska, Biljana
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [50] Knowledge Argument: Scientific Reasoning and the Explanatory Gap
    Gerspacher, Rogerio
    AXIOMATHES, 2018, 28 (01): : 63 - 71