Conceptual review on scientific reasoning and scientific thinking

被引:0
|
作者
Carlos Díaz
Birgit Dorner
Heinrich Hussmann
Jan-Willem Strijbos
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Department of Psychology
[2] Aarhus University,Interacting Minds Centre
[3] Katholische Stiftungshochschule München,Department of Social Work
[4] Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Media Informatics Group
[5] University of Groningen,Department of Educational Sciences
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Scientific reasoning; Scientific thinking; Thinking; Reasoning; Concept review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When conducting a systematic analysis of the concept of scientific reasoning (SR), we found confusion regarding the definition of the concept, its characteristics and its blurred boundaries with the concept of scientific thinking (ST). Furthermore, some authors use the concepts as synonyms. These findings raised three issues we aimed to answer in the present study: (1) are SR and ST the same concept, (2) if not, what are the differences between them, and (3) how can SR and ST be characterised and operationalised for systematic research? We conducted a conceptual review using an integrative approach to analyse 166 texts. First, we found that thinking and reasoning might refer to different processes. Likewise, SR and ST can be characterised as distinct concepts. Furthermore, the review identified that differences found between the concepts of SR and ST are grounded in ontological and epistemological perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:4313 / 4325
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conceptual review on scientific reasoning and scientific thinking
    Diaz, Carlos
    Dorner, Birgit
    Hussmann, Heinrich
    Strijbos, Jan-Willem
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (06) : 4313 - 4325
  • [2] SCCR digital learning system for scientific conceptual change and scientific reasoning
    She, Hsiao-Ching
    Lee, Chin-Quen
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (02) : 724 - 742
  • [3] What if...: The use of conceptual Simulations in scientific reasoning
    Trickett, Susan Bell
    Trafton, J. Gregory
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2007, 31 (05) : 843 - 875
  • [4] THE SYLLOGISTIC REASONING AS A BASIC MODEL OF THE MORAL AND SCIENTIFIC THINKING
    Posada Ramirez, Jorge Gregorio
    SOPHIA-EDUCACION, 2011, 7 (01): : 48 - 57
  • [5] The role of creative thinking in children's scientific reasoning
    Willemsen, Robin H.
    de Vink, Isabelle C.
    Kroesbergen, Evelyn H.
    Lazonder, Ard W.
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 49
  • [6] Conspiracy theory beliefs, scientific reasoning and the analytical thinking paradox
    Georgiou, Neophytos
    Delfabbro, Paul
    Balzan, Ryan
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (06) : 1523 - 1534
  • [7] Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion
    Chin-Quen Lee
    Hsiao-Ching She
    Research in Science Education, 2010, 40 : 479 - 504
  • [8] Facilitating Students' Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion
    Lee, Chin-Quen
    She, Hsiao-Ching
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 40 (04) : 479 - 504
  • [9] Brain activations associated with scientific reasoning: a literature review
    Lucian Nenciovici
    Geneviève Allaire-Duquette
    Steve Masson
    Cognitive Processing, 2019, 20 : 139 - 161
  • [10] Brain activations associated with scientific reasoning: a literature review
    Nenciovici, Lucian
    Allaire-Duquette, Genevieve
    Masson, Steve
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2019, 20 (02) : 139 - 161