Exposure to Lived Representations of Abortion in Popular Television Program Plotlines on Abortion-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Support: An Exploratory Study

被引:0
作者
Stephanie Herold
Andréa Becker
Rosalyn Schroeder
Gretchen Sisson
机构
[1] Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH),
来源
Sex Roles | 2024年 / 90卷
关键词
Television; Abortion; Abortion stigma; Entertainment; Attitudes; Media representations; Narrative persuasion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence suggests that entertainment media may influence knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to health topics. After the overturning of Roe v. Wade, it is critical to examine how these media may be associated with people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions related to abortion. Using a non-experimental ex post facto design, we examined whether exposure to any of three abortion plotlines was correlated with (a) greater knowledge about abortion, (b) lower stigmatizing attitudes about abortion, and (c) higher likelihood of supporting someone seeking an abortion among a sample of television audience members (N = 1,016), administered via a survey on Qualtrics. We selected three scripted, fictional abortion plotlines on the U.S. television shows Station 19, Better Things, and A Million Little Things, based on medical accuracy and airdates near each other in March 2022. Exposure to a plotline was defined as accurately answering at least two recall questions about a given plotline. We found that compared to those who were not exposed to any of the plotlines, exposure to any of the three plot lines was associated with greater knowledge about abortion and higher willingness to support a friend seeking an abortion, but not with lower stigmatizing attitudes. Exposure to medically accurate depictions of abortion on television may be one way to improve knowledge about abortion and community support for people seeking abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 293
页数:13
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Adamczyk A(2020)Examining public opinion about abortion: A mixed methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years Sociological Inquiry 90 920-954
[2]  
Kim C(2022)The role of racism and sexism in attitudes towards abortion among white, latinx, and black individuals Sex Roles 87 435-454
[3]  
Dillon L(2020)Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice Human Communication Research 46 120-160
[4]  
Baker MR(2017)State-mandated (mis) information and women’s endorsement of common abortion myths Women’s Health Issues 27 129-135
[5]  
McClelland SI(2015)Does state-level context matter for individuals’ knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the ‘red states v. blue states’ hypothesis Culture Health & Sexuality 17 733-746
[6]  
Jozkowski KN(2022)Contentious entertainment: The role of character and narrative features in shaping audience response to abortion storylines Journal of Health Communication 27 232-240
[7]  
Banas JA(2020)Efficacy, distancing, and reconciling: Religion and race in americans’ abortion attitudes Religions 11 1-23
[8]  
Bessarabova E(2013)I’m not that type of person: Managing the stigma of having an abortion Deviant Behavior 34 973-990
[9]  
Massey ZB(2019)Contributions of mainstream sexual media exposure to sexual attitudes, perceived peer norms, and sexual behavior: A meta-analysis Journal of Adolescent Health 64 430-436
[10]  
Berglas NF(2021)Examining the relationship between Roe v. Wade knowledge and sentiment across political party and abortion identity Sexuality Research and Social Policy 19 837-848