An Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Probability via Contextuality

被引:0
作者
Claudio Garola
机构
[1] University of Salento,Department of Mathematics and Physics
来源
Foundations of Science | 2020年 / 25卷
关键词
Quantum probability; Contextuality; Entanglement; Quantum measurements;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
According to a standard view, quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and quantum probability does not satisfy Kolmogorov’s axioms. We show, by considering the macroscopic contexts associated with measurement procedures and the microscopic contexts (μ-contexts) underlying them, that one can interpret quantum probability as epistemic, despite its non-Kolmogorovian structure. To attain this result we introduce a predicate language L(x), a classical probability measure on it and a family of classical probability measures on sets of μ-contexts, each element of the family corresponding to a (macroscopic) measurement procedure. By using only Kolmogorovian probability measures we can thus define mean conditional probabilities on the set of properties of any quantum system that admit an epistemic interpretation but are not bound to satisfy Kolmogorov’s axioms. The generalized probability measures associated with states in QM can then be seen as special cases of these mean probabilities, which explains how they can be non-classical and provides them with an epistemic interpretation. Moreover, the distinction between compatible and incompatible properties is explained in a natural way, and purely theoretical classical conditional probabilities coexist with empirically testable quantum conditional probabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 120
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Aerts D(1986)A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics Journal of Mathematical Physics 27 202-210
[2]  
Aerts D(1999)Foundations of quantum physics: A general realistic and operational approach International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 289-358
[3]  
Aerts D(2005)A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation Kibernetes 34 176-204
[4]  
Gabora L(2014)The extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics and the hidden-measurement solution of the measurement problem Annalen der Physik 351 975-1025
[5]  
Aerts D(1964)On the Einstein–Podolski–Rosen paradox Physics 1 195-200
[6]  
Sassoli de Bianchi M(1966)On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics Reviews of Modern Physics 38 447-452
[7]  
Bell JS(1936)The logic of quantum mechanics Annals of Mathematics 37 823-843
[8]  
Bell JS(1999)Semantic realism: A new philosophy for quantum physics International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38 3241-3252
[9]  
Birkhoff G(2014)Embedding quantum mechanics into a broader noncontextual theory Foundations of Science 19 217-239
[10]  
von Neumann J(2004)Locality and measurement within the SR model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics Foundations of Physics 34 449-475