Periprosthetic fractures: basics, classification and treatment principles

被引:1
作者
Everding, J. [1 ]
Schliemann, B. [1 ]
Raschke, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Unfall Hand & Wiederherstellungschirurg, Waldeyer Str 1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
CHIRURG | 2020年 / 91卷 / 10期
关键词
Unified classification system; Risk factors; Conservative treatment; Osteosynthesis; Revision arthroplasty; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; HUMERAL FRACTURES; FEMUR FRACTURES; PATELLAR FRACTURE; IPSILATERAL FEMUR; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FIXATION; ACETABULUM; STABILITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00104-020-01219-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) are becoming an increasingly important topic in orthopedics and trauma surgery due to the rising number of endoprosthetic joint replacements. The recently published unified classification system (UCS) has replaced numerous historical classification systems and can be applied to all PPFx regardless of the bone or joint involved. The treatment of PPFx requires individual therapeutic concepts taking patient-dependent and patient-independent factors into consideration. The conservative treatment of PPFx is only justified in exceptional situations. In contrast, the choice between operative treatment and deciding between osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty is particularly based on the assessment of the implant stability. In order to achieve fracture consolidation and also a good functional outcome, knowledge of the basic biomechanical principles of operative (osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis) treatment of periprosthetic fractures is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 803
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty
    Agten, C. A.
    Sutter, R.
    Pfirrmann, C. W. A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 2014, 54 (07): : 715 - 725
  • [2] Bozic KJ, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P101
  • [3] Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum
    Callaghan, JJ
    Kim, YS
    Pedersen, DR
    Brown, TD
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 30 (02) : 221 - +
  • [4] Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Mechanisms of fracture and treatment options
    Campbell, JT
    Moore, RS
    Iannotti, JP
    Norris, TR
    Williams, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (04) : 406 - 413
  • [5] Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: A register study of 639 cases in Sweden
    Chatziagorou, Georgios
    Lindahl, Hans
    Karrholm, Johan
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (12): : 2292 - 2300
  • [6] Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision
    Cohen, S.
    Flecher, X.
    Parratte, S.
    Ollivier, M.
    Argenson, J. -N.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) : 363 - 367
  • [7] CULP RW, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P212
  • [8] Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty - Evaluation and management
    Davidson, Darin
    Pike, Jeffrey
    Garbuz, Donald
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09) : 2000 - 2012
  • [9] Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology and Future Projections
    Della Rocca, Gregory J.
    Leung, Kwok Sui
    Pape, Hans-Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 : S66 - S70
  • [10] Della Valle Craig J, 2003, Instr Course Lect, V52, P281