Analysis of Geocell-Reinforced Stone Column-Supported Embankment Considering Soil-Structure Interaction

被引:0
作者
M. P. Vibhoosha
Anjana Bhasi
Sitaram Nayak
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology Karnataka Surathkal,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] National Institute of Technology Calicut,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
Stone column; Geocell; 3D coupled analyses; Interaction; Stress concentration ratio; Bulging; Settlement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geocells are a superior form of reinforcement due to their cost-effectiveness and three-dimensional confining properties. The effect of the basal geocell layer on the performance of the stone column-supported embankment was evaluated in this paper by carrying out time-dependent coupled analyses considering the geocell-infill soil interactions. The various parameters, such as arching, stress concentration ratio, surface settlement, column bulging characteristics, and the influence of various types of infill materials and drainage blanket thickness on column-supported embankment behavior, were analyzed. The load transfer mechanism was quantified using the term stress concentration ratio, and with the use of geocell mattress above stone columns, the stress concentration ratio increased by 1.5 times that of ordinary stone columns. Also, it was observed that compared to ordinary stone column-supported embankment, the combination of stone columns with geocell-sand mattress resulted in a further reduction of the foundation settlement by 15%. Analysis results showed that the arching behavior is not predominant in geocell-reinforced columnar structures. The various analytical methods like Guido et al. (1987), Low et al. (1994), and Abusharar et al. (2009), which were developed for geosynthetic reinforced columnar embankments, were found to significantly under-predict the stress reduction ratio values with geocells.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 72
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abusharar SW(2009)A simplified method for analysis of a piled embankment reinforced with geosynthetics Geotext. Geomembr 27 39-52
[2]  
Zheng JJ(2007)Behaviour of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis J.Geotech. Geoenviron. 133 405-415
[3]  
Chen BG(2016)Performance evaluation of railway subballast stabilised with geocell based on pull-out testing Geotext. Geomembr 44 579-591
[4]  
Yin JH(2007)Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading Can. Geotech. J. 44 905-916
[5]  
Ambily AP(2008)Modeling of granular bed-stone column-improved soft soil Int. J. Numer. Anal. Geomech. 32 1267-1288
[6]  
Gandhi SR(2010)A mathematical model to study the soil arching effect in stone column-supported embankment resting on soft soil Appl. Math. Model. 34 3871-3883
[7]  
Biabani MM(2017)Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone columns in soft clay Geotext. Geomembr 45 653-664
[8]  
Ngo NT(2015)Soil arching analysis in embankments on soft clays reinforced by stone columns Struct. Eng. Mech. 56 507-534
[9]  
Indraratna B(2015)3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds Geotext. Geomembr 43 171-181
[10]  
Dash SK(1988)Analysis of piled embankments Ground Eng. 21 12-18