Human Capital, Education and the Promotion of Social Cooperation: A Philosophical Critique

被引:0
作者
Tal Gilead
机构
[1] Hebrew University,School of Education
来源
Studies in Philosophy and Education | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Education; Human capital; Social cooperation; Economics; Philosophy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although since the 1960s human capital theory has played a major role in guiding educational policy, philosophical issues that stem from this development have rarely been discussed. In this article, I critically examine how the idea that human capital should serve as a guide to educational policy making stands in relation to the role assigned to education in promoting social cooperation. I begin by exploring the conception of human conduct that underlies human capital theory. I then move to examine the conception of social cooperation that tacitly guides human capital theory and maintain that it could not be effectively defended. I, therefore, turn to examine alternative ways to combine between human capital theory and the promotion of social cooperation. My main argument is that under existing conditions there is a deep theoretical incompatibility between the philosophical foundations of human capital theory and the ways in which education seeks to promote social cooperation.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 567
页数:12
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Coleman JS(1988)Social capital in the creation of human capital The American Journal of Sociology 94 95-120
[2]  
Lawson T(2006)The nature of heterodox economics Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 483-505
[3]  
Miljkovic D(2005)Rational choice and irrational individuals or simply an irrational theory: A critical review of the hypothesis of perfect rationality The Journal of Socio-Economics 34 621-634
[4]  
Sen AK(1977)Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundation of economic theory Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 317-344
[5]  
Sweetland SR(1996)Human capital theory: Foundations of a field of inquiry Review of Educational Research 3 341-359
[6]  
Winch C(2002)The economic aims of education Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 101-116