Genome editing technologies and their applications in crop improvement

被引:0
|
作者
Rukmini Mishra
Kaijun Zhao
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences (CAAS),National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Science
来源
Plant Biotechnology Reports | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
Crop improvement; Genome editing; ZFN; TALENs; CRISPR/Cas9;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Crop improvement is very essential to meet the increasing global food demands and enhance food nutrition. Conventional crop-breeding methods have certain limitations such as taking lot of time and resources, and causing biosafety concerns. These limitations could be overcome by the recently emerged-genome editing technologies that can precisely modify DNA sequences at the genomic level using sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs). Among the artificially engineered SSNs, the CRISPR/Cas9 is the most recently developed targeted genome modification system and seems to be more efficient, inexpensive, easy, user-friendly and rapidly adopted genome-editing tool. Large-scale genome editing has not only improved the yield and quality but also has enhanced the disease resistance ability in several model and other major crops. Increasing case studies suggest that genome editing is an efficient, precise and powerful technology that can accelerate basic and applied research towards crop improvement. In this review, we briefly overviewed the structure and mechanism of genome editing tools and then emphatically reviewed the advances in the application of genome editing tools for crop improvement, including the most recent case studies with CRISPR/Cpf1 and base-editing technologies. We have also discussed the future prospects towards the improvement of agronomic traits in crops.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genome editing applications in plants: high-throughput CRISPR/Cas editing for crop improvement
    Thomson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 56 - 56
  • [22] Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding
    Hua, Kai
    Zhang, Jinshan
    Botella, Jose Ramon
    Ma, Changle
    Kong, Fanjiang
    Liu, Baohui
    Zhu, Jian-Kang
    MOLECULAR PLANT, 2019, 12 (08) : 1047 - 1059
  • [23] CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing for crop improvement: current applications and future prospects
    Geupil Jang
    Young Hee Joung
    Plant Biotechnology Reports, 2019, 13 : 1 - 10
  • [24] CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing for crop improvement: current applications and future prospects
    Jang, Geupil
    Joung, Young Hee
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 13 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [25] The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement
    Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas
    Willig, Christopher
    Zahringer, Kenneth
    PLANT GENOME, 2023, 16 (02)
  • [26] Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants
    Yadav, Rakesh Kumar
    Tripathi, Manoj Kumar
    Tiwari, Sushma
    Tripathi, Niraj
    Asati, Ruchi
    Chauhan, Shailja
    Tiwari, Prakash Narayan
    Payasi, Devendra K.
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [27] Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities
    Abdallah, Naglaa A.
    Prakash, Channapatna S.
    McHughen, Alan G.
    GM CROPS & FOOD-BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE AND THE FOOD CHAIN, 2015, 6 (04): : 183 - 205
  • [28] New breeding technique "genome editing" for crop improvement: applications, potentials and challenges
    Aglawe, Supriya B.
    Barbadikar, Kalyani M.
    Mangrauthia, Satendra K.
    Madhav, M. Sheshu
    3 BIOTECH, 2018, 8 (08)
  • [29] Cereal crop genome editing tools and their applications to sustainable agriculture
    Elarabi, Nagwa I.
    Hesham, Abd El-Latif
    El-Beltagi, Hossam S.
    Rezk, Adel A.
    Shalaby, Tarek A.
    Al-Saikhan, Mohamed S.
    Mohamed, Amal A.
    Abdelhadi, Abdelhadi A.
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [30] DNA-free genome editing methods for targeted crop improvement
    Chidananda Nagamangala Kanchiswamy
    Plant Cell Reports, 2016, 35 : 1469 - 1474