Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) uncertainty analysis for watershed water quality modeling and management

被引:0
作者
Yi Zheng
Feng Han
机构
[1] Peking University,College of Engineering
[2] Peking University,Institute of Water Sciences
[3] Beijing Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Utilization and Management,undefined
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2016年 / 30卷
关键词
Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Uncertainty analysis; Water quality modeling; DREAM; SWAT; Nonpoint source pollution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Watershed-scale water quality (WWQ) models are now widely used to support management decision-making. However, significant uncertainty in the model outputs remains a largely unaddressed issue. In recent years, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), a category of formal Bayesian approaches for uncertainty analysis (UA), has become popular in the field of hydrological modeling, but its applications to WWQ modeling have been rare. This study systematically evaluated the applicability of MCMC in assessing the uncertainty of WWQ modeling, using Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM(ZS)) and SWAT as the representative MCMC algorithm and WWQ model, respectively. The nitrate pollution in Newport Bay watershed was the case study for numerical experiments. It has been concluded that the efficiency and effectiveness of a MCMC algorithm would depend on some critical designs of the UA, including: (i) how many and which model parameters to be considered as random in the MCMC analysis; (ii) where to fix the non-random model parameters; and (iii) which criteria to stop the Markov Chain. The study results also indicate that the MCMC UA has to be management-oriented, that is, management objectives should be factored into the designs of the UA, rather than be considered after the UA.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 308
页数:15
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [1] Akhavan S(2010)Application of SWAT model to investigate nitrate leaching in Hamadan-Bahar Watershed, Iran Agric Ecosyst Environ 139 675-688
  • [2] Abedi-Koupai J(2008)So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent? J Hydrol 354 15-32
  • [3] Mousavi SF(2002)Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets Water Res 36 4113-4127
  • [4] Afyuni M(2007)An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models Environ Modell Softw 22 1509-1518
  • [5] Eslamian SS(2004)Decision Support System for Stakeholder Involvement J Environ Eng-ASCE 130 714-721
  • [6] Abbaspour KC(2014)Improvement and comparison of likelihood functions for model calibration and parameter uncertainty analysis within a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme J Hydrol 519 2202-2214
  • [7] Beven KJ(1994)Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models J Hydrol 158 265-284
  • [8] Smith PJ(2013)Pitfalls and improvements in the joint inference of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in hydrological model calibration Water Resour Res 49 4518-4524
  • [9] Freer JE(2011)Quantifying watershed sensitivity to spatially variable N loading and the relative importance of watershed N retention mechanisms Water Resour Res 47 W08524-472
  • [10] Brun R(1992)Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences Stat Sci 7 457-242