Altered Expression of Proliferation-Inducing and Proliferation-Inhibiting Genes Might Contribute to Acquired Doxorubicin Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells

被引:0
作者
Ekram M. Saleh
Raafat A. El-Awady
Mervat A. Abdel Alim
Abdel Hady A. Abdel Wahab
机构
[1] National Cancer Institute,Biochemistry Unit, Tumour Biology Department
[2] Cairo University,Pharmacology Unit, Tumour Biology Department
[3] National Cancer Institute,Zoology Department, College of Science
[4] Cairo University,undefined
[5] Al-Azher University for Girls,undefined
来源
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics | 2009年 / 55卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Doxorubicin; DNA damage response (DDR); TOPOIIα; MDR1; GST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was designed to investigate the molecular changes that may develop during exposure of breast cancer cells to anticancer agents and that may lead to acquired resistance. We used two breast cancer cell lines, a parental (MCF7/WT) and a doxorubicin-resistant (MCF7/DOX) one. Cell survival, cell cycle distribution and RT-PCR expression level of genes involved in DNA damage response, MDR1, GST and TOPOIIα were measured. MCF7/DOX cells were five-fold more resistant to doxorubicin (DOX) than the MCF7/WT cells. DOX treatment causes arrest of MCF7/DOX cells in G1 and G2 phases of cell cycle whereas MCF7/WT cells were arrested in S-phase. The molecular changes in both cell lines due to DOX treatment could be classified into: (1) the basal level of p53, p21, BRCA1, GST and TOPOIIα mRNA was higher in MCF7/DOX than MCF7/WT. During DOX treatment, the expression level of these genes decreased in both cell lines but the rate of down-regulation was faster in MCF7/WT than MCF7/DOX cells. (2) The expression level of MDR1 was the same in both cell lines but 48 and 72 h of drug treatment, MDR1 disappeared in MCF7/WT but still expressed in MCF7/DOX. (3) There was no change in the expression level of BAX, FAS and BRCA2 in both cell lines. Conclusively, after validation in clinical samples, overexpression of genes like BRCA1, p53, p21, GST, MDR1 and TOPOIIα could be used as a prognostic biomarker for detection of acquired resistance in breast cancer and as therapeutic targets for the improvement of breast cancer treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:10
相关论文
共 218 条
  • [1] Mauri D(2005)Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis Journal of the National Cancer Institute 97 188-194
  • [2] Pavlidis N(2003)Liposomal anthracyclines: Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer Oncologist 8 10-16
  • [3] Ioannidis J(2007)DNA damage checkpoints: From initiation to recovery or adaptation Current Opinion in Cell Biology 19 238-245
  • [4] Campos S(2004)Mammalian cell cycle checkpoints: Signalling pathways and their organization in space and time DNA Repair 3 3997-4007
  • [5] Bartek J(2003)Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer Cancer Cell 3 421-429
  • [6] Jiri Lukas J(2007)DNA damage signaling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression Oncogene 26 7773-7779
  • [7] Lukas J(1999)In vitro chemosensitivity testing and mechanisms of drug resistance Current Oncology Reports 1 77-84
  • [8] Lukas C(2002)The medicinal chemistry of multidrug resistance (MDR) reversing drugs Farmaco 57 385-415
  • [9] Bartek J(2002)Doxorubicin-induced DNA intercalation and scavenging by nuclear glutathione S-transferase π FASEB Journal 15 2702-2714
  • [10] Bartek J(1994)Multi-drug resistance associated protein gene over-expression and reduced drug sensitivity of topoisomerase II in a human breast carcinoma MCF7 cell line selected for etoposide resistance Cancer Research 54 152-158