Enhancing primary care and preventive services through Interprofessional practice and education

被引:0
作者
Terri Fowler
David Garr
Natalie Di Pietro Mager
Joan Stanley
机构
[1] Medical University of South Carolina,College of Nursing
[2] Medical University of South Carolina,College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine
[3] Ohio Northern University,College of Pharmacy
[4] American Association of Colleges of Nursing,undefined
来源
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | / 9卷
关键词
Preventive services; Primary care; Interprofessional practice and education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Interprofessional (IP) practice and education are important when seeking to respond to the growing demand for primary and preventive care services. Multiple professions with synergistic expertise are needed to effectively provide health promotion, disease prevention, and patient education and to help patients with multiple comorbidities, chronic health conditions, and care coordination. A recent study by Schor et al. titled, “Multidisciplinary work promotes preventive medicine and health education in primary care: a cross-sectional survey,” compares the implementation of preventive services in three primary care models. Higher rates of health services, patient education, and health outcomes were documented in two different models of care involving persons in multiple professions when compared with independent solo physicians’ practices. In this commentary, we focus on the value of IP team-based care, continuing professional development, and the impact of the team on practice performance and health outcomes. Key components of effective IP teams include using consistent terminology to describe the team composition and function, team structures with purposeful selection of professions to address gaps in care, leadership support, and IP continuing professional development and education.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Borsky A(2018)Few Americans receive all high-priority, appropriate clinical preventive services Health Aff 37 925-928
  • [2] Zhan C(2013)Terminology used to describe health care teams: an integrative review of the literature J Multidiscip Healthc 6 65-74
  • [3] Miller T(2019)Toward a system where workforce planning and interprofessional practice and education are designed around patients and populations not professions J Interprof Care. 33 389-397
  • [4] Ngo-Metzger Q(2017)A comparison of nurse practitioner, physician assistants, and primary care physicians’ patterns of practice and quality of care in health centers Med Care 55 615-622
  • [5] Bierman AS(2018)Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 CD001271-164
  • [6] Meyers D(2015)Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialized ambulatory care: systematic review BMJ Open 5 e007167-811
  • [7] Chamberlain-Salaun J(2017)The changing roles of community nurses: the case of health plan nurses in Israel Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 6 69-3
  • [8] Mills J(2018)Clinical and economic benefits of pharmacist involvement in a community hospital-affiliated patient-centered medical home J Manag Care Spec Pharm 24 160-626
  • [9] Usher K(2011)An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 CD009255-undefined
  • [10] Fraher E(2014)Physician compensation strategies and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries Am J Manag Care 20 804-undefined