Knowledge translation research in population health: Establishing a collaborative research agenda

被引:18
作者
Dagenais C. [1 ]
Ridde V. [2 ]
Laurendeau M.-C. [3 ]
Souffez K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Université de Montréal, 555 René-Lévesque Ouest, Montreal, Quebec
[2] Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec
[3] Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Montreal, Quebec
关键词
Social Service; Population Health; Concept Mapping; Knowledge Translation; Social Service Network;
D O I
10.1186/1478-4505-7-28
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite the increasing mobilization of researchers and funding organizations around knowledge translation (KT) in Canada and elsewhere, many questions have been only partially answered, particularly in the field of population health. This article presents the results of a systematic process to draw out possible avenues of collaboration for researchers, practitioners and decision-makers who work in the area of KT. The main objective was to establish a research agenda on knowledge translation in population health. Methods: Using the Concept Mapping approach, the research team wanted to identify priority themes for the development of research on KT in population health. Mapping is based on multivariate statistical analyses (multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis) in which statements produced during a brainstorming session are grouped in weighted clusters. The final maps are a visual representation of the priority themes of research on KT. Especially designed for facilitating consensus in the understanding and organization of various concepts, the Concept Mapping method proved suitable for achieving this objective. Results: The maps were produced by 19 participants from university settings, and from institutions within the health and social services network. Three main perspectives emerge from this operation: (1) The evaluation of the effectiveness of KT efforts is one of the main research priorities; (2) The importance of taking into consideration user contexts in any KT effort; (3) The challenges related to sharing power for decision-making and action-taking among various stakeholder groups. These perspectives open up avenues of collaboration for stakeholders who are involved in research on KT. Besides these three main perspectives, the concept maps reveal three other trends which should be emphasized. Conclusion: The Concept Mapping process reported in this article aimed to provoke collective reflection on the research questions that should be studied, in order to foster coherence in research activities in the field of population health. Based on this, it is appropriate to continue to support the development of research projects in KT and the formation of research teams in this field. Research on KT must lead to concrete outcomes within communities that are interested in the question. © 2009 Dagenais et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Davies H.T.O., Nutley S., Walter I., Assessing the impact of social science research: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues. Background paper for the ESRC Symposium on assessing non-academic impact of research, (2005)
  • [2] Graham I.D., Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?, The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 1, pp. 13-24, (2006)
  • [3] Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health (ICRH): Research priorities, (2008)
  • [4] Culyer A.J., Lomas J., Deliberative processes and evidence-informed decision making in healthcare: Do they work and how might we know?, Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2, pp. 357-371, (2006)
  • [5] Lomas J., The in-between world of knowledge brokering, British Medical Journal, 334, 7585, pp. 129-132, (2007)
  • [6] Happell B., Johnston L., Hill C., Implementing research findings into mental health nursing practice: Exploring the clinical research fellowship approach, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12, 4, pp. 251-258, (2003)
  • [7] Martin L.M., Integrating an evidenced-based research intervention in the discharge of mental health clients, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 21, 2, pp. 101-111, (2007)
  • [8] Happell B., Martin T., Changing the culture of mental health nursing: The contribution of nursing clinical development units, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26, 9, pp. 921-933, (2005)
  • [9] Axford N., Developing a common language in children's services through research-based inter-disciplinary training, Social Work Education, 25, 2, pp. 161-176, (2009)
  • [10] Nutley S., Percy-Smith M.J., Solesburry W., Models of research impact: A cross-sector review of literature and practice building effective research, (2003)