Effect of roughness on water flow through a synthetic single rough fracture

被引:0
作者
Zhou Chen
Jiazhong Qian
Hongbin Zhan
Zhifang Zhou
Jinguo Wang
Yefei Tan
机构
[1] Hohai University,School of Earth Sciences and Engineering
[2] Hefei University of Technology,School of Resources and Environmental Engineering
[3] Texas A&M University,Department of Geology and Geophysics
[4] Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,undefined
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2017年 / 76卷
关键词
Fracture roughness; Friction factor; Discharge per unit width; Non-linear flow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A single fracture is usually idealized theoretically as smooth parallel plates, but the real fractures are rough-walled with points of contact. Though relative roughness is considered in quantifying the flow through a single rough fracture (SRF) previously, additional factors such as the distribution of rough elements and bending degree of streamlines should be considered in order to obtain more accurate results. Semiempirical friction factor (f) and discharge per unit width (q) equations are first deduced taking relative roughness, roughness elements distribution and streamline reattachment length into consideration. A horizontal SRF model was then set up and a series of experiments and simulations were performed. Main conclusions are drawn: Recirculation of streamlines arises in the rough element and the intensity of the recirculation increases with the angle from which the streamlines enter into the rough elements and Reynolds number (Re); streamlines are discontinuously distributed when asperity height is large and nonlinear flow occurs; the nonlinearity of the flow increases with the increasing the asperity height and Re; the critical value of related roughness used to judge whether the influence of roughness on water flow through a SRF can be ignored or not should be much lower than 0.033; the revised f and q equations under laminar flow through a SRF are proved to be better when calculating the f and q values.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Ai-Yaarubi AH(2005)Navier–Stokes simulations of fluid flow through a rock fracture Geophhs Monogr Ser 162 55-64
[2]  
Pain CC(1994)A mathematical model for flow and solute transport in non-homogeneous rock fractures Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31 719-731
[3]  
Grattoni CA(2003)The fracture flow equation and its perturbation solution Water Resour Res 39 1365-1347
[4]  
Zimmerman RW(1987)Fluid Flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness J Geophys Res 92 1337-2540
[5]  
Amadei B(1995)Applicability of the Reynolds equation for modeling fluid flow between rough surfaces Geophys Res Lett 22 2537-5132
[6]  
Illangasekare T(1998)Experimental observation of fluid flow channels in a single fracture J Geophys Res Solid Earth 103 5125-60
[7]  
Basha HA(2003)Fluid flow in synthetic rough-walled fractures: Navier–Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations Water Resour Res 504 41-825
[8]  
El-Asmar W(2004)Macroscale model and viscous-inertia effects for Navier–Stokes flow in a radial fracture with corrugated walls J Fluid Mech 21 820-156
[9]  
Brown SR(2007)Navier–Stokes flow and transport simulations using real fractures shows heavy tailing due to eddies Geophys Res Lett 11 133-12278
[10]  
Brown SR(2009)Experimental study of friction factor for groundwater flow in a single rough fracture J Hydrodyn 98 12267-12