Effect of fluoride varnish in combination with simulated oral environment on enamel–bracket shear bond strength

被引:0
作者
Stefan Lohfeld
Burt Kawamoto
Yong Wang
Mary P. Walker
机构
[1] University of Missouri-Kansas City,Department of Oral and Craniofacial Science, School of Dentistry
来源
Odontology | 2023年 / 111卷
关键词
Fluoride varnish; Bracket bonding; Shear bond strength; Adhesive remnant index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the effect of fluoride varnish application combined with a simulated oral environment prior to bracket bonding on the shear bond strength (SBS) between brackets and tooth enamel. Sixty de-identified, extracted teeth were grouped to either receive or not receive fluoride varnish and then stored for 7 days at 37 °C in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution or PBS combined with three 15-min cycles/day in a demineralizing solution to simulate pH variation following meals. Subsequently, brackets were bonded and after 24-h dark cure at 37 °C, debonded using shear forces in a simulated oral environment. The maximum shear force was used to calculate SBS, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined by image analysis of photos of the bracket mesh pad after debonding. A statistically higher SBS (10.16 MPa) was observed when fluoride varnish was applied prior to storage in PBS + demineralizing solution compared to SBS (6.38 MPa) following storage in the same solution without varnish application. Based on 37% effect size, this difference is also clinically relevant. In contrast, no significant differences in SBS were observed with varnish application combined with PBS with no demineralizing solution or between storage solution alone. Moreover, there was no significant difference in ARI due to varnish combined with either storage method or storage solution only. Results suggest varnish application prior to bracket bonding in combination with simulated oral environment that included acid exposure is beneficial in maintaining higher SBS between bracket and enamel. Despite higher SBS, adhesive remaining on enamel did not increase.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Almosa N(2018)Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review Pak J Med Sci. 34 744-750
[2]  
Zafar H(2001)Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119 36-42
[3]  
Rix D(2013)Comparison of shear bond strength and estimation of adhesive remnant index between light-cure composite and dual-cure composite: an in vitro study Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 6 166-170
[4]  
Foley TF(2002)The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer Angle Orthod 72 554-557
[5]  
Mamandras A(2004)Bond strength of various bracket base designs Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125 65-70
[6]  
Verma G(2001)Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results Angle Orthod 71 141-148
[7]  
Trehan M(2013)The Stephan curve revisited Odontology 101 2-8
[8]  
Sharma S(1982)Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding Am J Orthod 81 93-98
[9]  
Bishara SE(2001)A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function J Prosthet Dent 85 162-169
[10]  
Oonsombat C(2018)Effect of different bonding protocols on degree of monomer conversion and bond strength between orthodontic brackets and enamel Braz Oral Res 32 S14-182