Shared Challenges and Solutions: The Common Future of Comparative Politics and Quantitative Methodology

被引:0
作者
Pang X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, 314 Mingzhai Hall, Beijing
[2] Institute for International Relations, Tsinghua University, Beijing
关键词
Comparative politics; Complex interdependence; Globalization; Interaction; Quantitative methods;
D O I
10.1007/s41111-016-0033-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This essay joins the discussion on “The Future of Comparative Politics” from a perspective of methodology, and argues that the challenges concerned in Schmitter’s essay are not endemic to comparative politics but shared ones in other research fields including quantitative methods. Recent trends and developments in quantitative methods show that quantitative and qualitative methods are increasingly integrated to jointly handle challenges with broad and profound impacts on the social sciences as a whole. This essay presents a brief introduction of the recent three revolutions in quantitative methods. The “Bayesian Revolution”, the “Credibility Revolution”, and the “Big Data Revolution” have fundamentally changed quantitative methods. The paper further displays that the challenges arising from the three revolutions are essentially the same ones with those in comparative politics, such as modeling complex interdependence, dealing with fuzzy concepts and the messy real world, and so on. Finally, the essay uses a few examples of some new analytical tools developed by quantitative methodologists to illustrate that qualitative knowledge and quantitative techniques should be seamlessly mixed to be innovative and powerful methods. All this points to a common future of comparative politics and quantitative methods. © 2016, Fudan University and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 488
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]  
Iacus S.M., King G., Porro G., Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 493, 106, pp. 345-361, (2011)
[42]  
Imai K., King G., Nall C., The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation (with discussions and rejoinder), Statistical Science, 24, 1, pp. 29-53, (2009)
[43]  
Imai K., Keele L., Tinley D., A general approach to causal mediation analysis, Psychological Methods, 15, 4, pp. 309-334, (2010)
[44]  
Imbens G.W., Angrist J.D., Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects, Econometrica, 62, 2, pp. 467-476, (1994)
[45]  
Jaynes E.T., Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, (2003)
[46]  
Keel L., The Discipline of Identification. Political Science and Politics, pp. 102-105, (2015)
[47]  
King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S., Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research, (1994)
[48]  
King G., Zeng L., The dangers of extreme counterfactuals, Political Analysis, 14, pp. 131-159, (2006)
[49]  
Kugler J., Domke W., Comparing the strength of nations, Comparative Political Studies, 19, pp. 39-69, (1986)
[50]  
Lazer D., Pentland A., Adamic L., Aral S., Barabasi A.-L., Brewer D., Christakis N., Contractor N., Fowler J., Gutmann M., Jebara T., King G., Macy M., Roy D., Van Alstyne M., Computational social science, Science, 323, pp. 721-733, (2009)