Polyandry, multiple mating, and female fitness in a water strider Aquarius paludum

被引:0
作者
Katri Ronkainen
Arja Kaitala
Sami M. Kivelä
机构
[1] University of Oulu,Department of Biology
来源
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | 2010年 / 64卷
关键词
Sexual conflict; Water strider; Polyandry; Mating rate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Contrary to Bateman’s principle, polyandry appears to be a common female mating strategy. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of polyandry. It is assumed that females gain either material or genetic benefits from multiple matings, or that they are coerced into mating by males. In water striders, mating is generally assumed to be costly to females, and they are thought to mate for reasons of convenience, adjusting their resistance to mating according to male harassment. Here, we tested the effect of number of matings (with the same male) and number of partners on female fitness in a water strider Aquarius paludum. In the first experiment, we regulated the time females spent with a male and found that females’ egg production increased with multiple matings up to a point. The result supports the existence of an optimal female mating frequency. In the second experiment, we tested how polyandry affects the number of eggs laid and egg hatching success. We conducted three different trials: females mated four times with either a single male, two different males, or with four different males. Females that mated with four different males laid the lowest number of eggs and had the lowest egg hatching success, suggesting that polyandry reduces females’ egg production and egg hatching success in A. paludum. We conclude that A. paludum females probably gain material benefits from mating but no genetic benefits were found in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 664
页数:7
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [21] Askenmo C(1984)The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict Evolution 38 1273-1282
  • [22] Dunn DW(1998)Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior Evolution 52 1-7
  • [23] Sumner JP(2003)Sexually transmitted chemical defense in a moth ( Evol Biol 33 173-194
  • [24] Goulson D(2005)) Evolution 59 152-159
  • [25] Dussourd DE(2000)Sperm dependence of female receptivity to remating in Biol Rev 75 21-64
  • [26] Ubik K(2007)Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance J Evol Biol 20 1469-1477
  • [27] Harvis C(1995)Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective Adv Study Behav 24 291-315
  • [28] Resch J(1992)Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets Nature 357 494-496
  • [29] Meinwald J(1988)Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits Oikos 52 69-72
  • [30] Eisner T(1992)Do female black field crickets Nature 355 440-441