Historical review: a short history of German neurology – from its origins to the 1940s

被引:0
作者
A. Karenberg
H. Fangerau
H. Steinmetz
P. Berlit
M. Grond
机构
[1] University of Cologne,Institute for the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine
[2] Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne,Department of Neurology
[3] Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics,undefined
[4] Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf,undefined
[5] University Hospital/Goethe University Frankfurt,undefined
[6] German Society of Neurology,undefined
来源
Neurological Research and Practice | / 1卷
关键词
Neurology/history; Specialization/history; Germany; National socialism/history;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims at reconstructing the development and role of German neurology between 1840 and 1940. Therefore a couple of original sources as well as selected material form the scattered secondary literature were assessed and reviewed. Since the middle of the nineteenth century, an intricate process of separation from internal medicine and psychiatry gradually led to forming a self-conscious community of German neurologists. While Moritz Heinrich Romberg had constructed a cognitive basis for neurology, scientific founders such as Wilhelm Erb, Carl Wernicke, Alois Alzheimer, Hermann Oppenheim, Max Nonne, and many others established the new discipline within modern medicine. In 1891, the first generation of “pure” neurologists succeeded in founding the German Journal for Neurology (Deutsche Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde) followed by an autonomous professional organisation, the Society of German Neurologists (Gesellschaft Deutscher Nervenärzte) in 1907. A variety of external factors, however, hampered the institutional evolution and thus the implementation of chairs and departments remained quite modest. In 1935, only 2 years after the National Socialists had seized power, the regulatory merger with the psychiatristsʼ society caused the cautious attempts of German neurologists for autonomy to end in complete failure. The imprisonment, murder and expulsion of neuroscientists declared as Jewish or non-Aryan caused profound changes in neurology, medicine, academic life, and health care in general. Further historical research is needed to reconstruct in detail the involvement of German neurologists in racial-hygienic and eugenic research as well as the institutional and scientific development of German neurology after World War II.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Beach TG(1987)The history of Alzheimer’s disease: Three debates Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 42 327-349
  • [2] Collmann H(2008)Georges Schaltenbrand (26.11.1897–24.10.1979) Würzburger Medizinhistorische Mitteilungen 27 63-92
  • [3] Dichgans J(2013)Entwicklung der Deutschen Neurologie nach 1960 Nervenarzt 83 1512-1522
  • [4] Karenberg A(2008)Die Gründung der “Gesellschaft Deutscher Nervenärzte” und die schwierigen Anfänge der klinischen Neurologie in Deutschland Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Nervenheilkunde 14 319-345
  • [5] Kreft G(1999)Der erste Lehrstuhlinhaber für Neurologie in Deutschland: Bemerkungen anläßlich eines Editorials von Th. Brandt Nervenarzt 70 1122-1123
  • [6] Martin M(2016)German neurology and the “third Reich” European Neurology 76 234-243
  • [7] Fangerau H(2016)Neurologie und Neurologen in der NS-Zeit: Voraussetzungen und Rahmenbedingungen vor und nach 1933 Nervenarzt 87 5-17
  • [8] Karenberg A(1994)The “Schaltenbrand experiment”: Scientific, historical and ethical perspectives Neurology 44 350-356
  • [9] Martin M(1991)Von der Nervenabteilung zur Neurologischen Klinik – die Etablierung des Heidelberger Lehrstuhls für Neurologie 1883-1969 Fortschritte der Neurologie·Psychiatrie 59 468-476
  • [10] Karenberg A(1993)Streitfall Nervenheilkunde – eine Studie zur disziplinären Genese der klinischen Neurologie in Deutschland Fortschritte der Neurologie·Psychiatrie 61 144-156