Public Investment and Income Taxation: Redistribution vs. Productive Performance

被引:0
作者
Thomas Gaube
机构
[1] Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods,
来源
Journal of Economics | 2005年 / 86卷
关键词
public inputs; income taxation; production efficiency; H21; H41; H54;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper deals with government investment in a static two-type self-selection model of optimum income taxation. It is shown that the second-best investment rule is consistent with efficient production, provided that public investment has no influence on relative factor prices. Otherwise, however, redistributive income taxation implies that optimal investment expenditures exceed (or fall below) the efficient level as long as they raise (or decrease) the wage rate of the unskilled individuals relative to the wage rate of the skilled individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Blackorby C.(2004)Production Efficiency and the Direct-Indirect Tax Mix Journal of Public Economic Theory 6 165-180
  • [2] Brett C.(1993)Public Goods, Self-Selection and Optimal Income Taxation International Economic Review 34 463-478
  • [3] Boadway R.(1981)Evaluation of Public Projects under Optimal Taxation Review of Economic Studies 47 447-457
  • [4] Keen M.(1997)How Big Should Government Be? National Tax Journal 50 197-213
  • [5] Christiansen V.(1999)Roads to Prosperity? Assessing the Link Between Public Capital and Productivity American Economic Review 89 619-638
  • [6] Feldstein M.(2000)When Do Distortionary Taxes Reduce the Optimal Supply of Public Goods? Journal of Public Economics 76 151-180
  • [7] Fernald J. G.(2005)Financing Public Goods with Income Taxation: Provision Rules vs. Provision Level International Tax and Public Finance 12 319-334
  • [8] Gaube T.(1965)Public Goods and Decentralization of Production Review of Economics and Statistics 47 118-120
  • [9] Gaube T.(1997)Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending Journal of Public Economics 66 33-53
  • [10] Kaizuka K.(1985)Paying for Public Inputs American Economic Review 75 235-238