A comparative study of audiological and surgical results in partial versus complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty

被引：0
作者：
AbdelKader H.A. [1 ]
Khafagy A.G. [1 ]
Rahman T.T.A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] E.N.T. Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo
来源：
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology | 2014年 / 30卷 / 1期
关键词：
cartilage tympanoplasty; complete strip; graft medialization; graft take; partial strip;
D O I：
10.4103/1012-5574.127183
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Abstract Hypothesis: Different techniques used in cartilage tympanoplasty are palisade technique, shield graft, in-lay butterfly graft, and island flap cartilage. Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare audiological and graft take results in partial versus complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients with central perforation of the tympanic membrane and age ranging from 18 to 40 years were selected. They were divided into two equal study groups of 30 patients each. The first group underwent complete strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty and the second group underwent partial strip cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty. Results: The overall success rate was 83.3% in the complete strip technique and 86.66% in the partial strip technique. In both study groups, there was statistically significant difference between the audiological results before and after operation. Furthermore, audiological and graft take results were better in the partial strip technique but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The overall results of partial strip tympanoplasty are better than complete strip tympanoplasty regarding graft take and audiological results. © 2014, The Egyptian Oto - Rhino - Laryngological Society.
引用
收藏
页码：1 / 4
页数：3
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Dornhoffer J., Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series, Laryngoscope, 113, 11, pp. 1844-1856, (2003)
  • [2] Amedee R.G., Mann W.J., Riechelmann H., Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty, Am J Otol, 10, 6, pp. 447-450, (1989)
  • [3] Duckert L.G., Muller J., Makielski K.H., Helms J., Composite autograft “shield” reconstruction of remnant tympanic membranes, Am J Otol, 16, 1, pp. 21-26, (1995)
  • [4] Page C., Charlet L., Strunski V., Cartilage tympanoplasty: postoperative functional results, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 265, 10, pp. 1195-1198, (2008)
  • [5] Tos M., Cartilage Tympanoplasty, (2009)
  • [6] Soliman S., Speech discrimination audiometry using Arabic phonetically balanced words, Ain-Shams med. J, 27, (1976)
  • [7] Hashemi S.B., Sohrabi H., Omranifard H., Comparison of tympanoplasty results with use of perichondrium-cartilage and temporalis facia, Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, 21, 56, pp. 63-66, (2009)
  • [8] Mokhtarinejad F., Abtahi S.H., Noei Alamdary S., Postoperative anatomic and functional results of homograft cartilage tympanoplasty, J Res Med Sci, 17, pp. S120-S124, (2012)
1