Candidate biomarkers for discrimination between infection and disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis

被引:0
作者
Marc Jacobsen
Dirk Repsilber
Andrea Gutschmidt
Albert Neher
Knut Feldmann
Hans J. Mollenkopf
Andreas Ziegler
Stefan H. E. Kaufmann
机构
[1] Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology,Department of Immunology
[2] University at Lübeck,Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics
[3] Asklepios Center for Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Surgery,Microarray Core Facilities
[4] Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology,Institute for Biochemistry and Biology
[5] University Potsdam,undefined
来源
Journal of Molecular Medicine | 2007年 / 85卷
关键词
Tuberculosis; Biomarkers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is controlled by an efficacious immune response in about 90% of infected individuals who do not develop disease. Although essential mediators of protection, e.g., interferon-γ, have been identified, these factors are insufficient to predict the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection. As a first step to determine additional biomarkers, we compared gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from tuberculosis patients and M. tuberculosis-infected healthy donors by microarray analysis. Differentially expressed candidate genes were predominantly derived from monocytes and comprised molecules involved in the antimicrobial defense, inflammation, chemotaxis, and intracellular trafficking. We verified differential expression for alpha-defensin 1, alpha-defensin 4, lactoferrin, Fcγ receptor 1A (cluster of differentiation 64 [CD64]), bactericidal permeability-increasing protein, and formyl peptide receptor 1 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Moreover, we identified increased protein expression of CD64 on monocytes from tuberculosis patients. Candidate biomarkers were then assessed for optimal study group discrimination. Using a linear discriminant analysis, a minimal group of genes comprising lactoferrin, CD64, and the Ras-associated GTPase 33A was sufficient for classification of (1) tuberculosis patients, (2) M. tuberculosis-infected healthy donors, and (3) noninfected healthy donors.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 621
页数:8
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]  
Altman DG(2000)What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19 453-473
[2]  
Royston P(2001)-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine inhibits both gamma interferon-and interleukin-10-induced expression of FcgammaRI on human monocytes Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8 402-408
[3]  
Beigier-Bompadre M(2003)Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood J Exp Med 197 711-723
[4]  
Barrionuevo P(2003)Gene expression profile in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls: identifying pathways relevant to disease Hum Mol Genet 12 2191-2199
[5]  
Alves-Rosa F(2004)Use of gene-expression profiling to identify prognostic subclasses in adult acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 350 1605-1616
[6]  
Rubel CJ(2005)Biostatistics 303. Discriminant analysis Singap Med J 46 54-61
[7]  
Palermo MS(2001)Induction of M3-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses by J Exp Med 193 1213-1220
[8]  
Isturiz MA(2001)-formylated peptides derived from Annu Rev Immunol 19 93-129
[9]  
Bennett L(2005)Immunology of tuberculosis J Infect Dis 192 1211-1218
[10]  
Palucka AK(2000)Ras-associated small GTPase 33A, a novel T cell factor, is downregulated in patients with tuberculosis Nat Genet 26 495-499