Quality of Life Assessment in Surgical Oncology Trials

被引:0
作者
Kerry Avery
Jane M. Blazeby
机构
[1] University of Bristol,Department of Social Medicine
[2] University of Bristol,Department of Clinical Sciences at South Bristol
[3] Clinical Sciences at South Bristol,Surgery, Level 7
[4] Bristol Royal Infirmary,undefined
来源
World Journal of Surgery | 2006年 / 30卷
关键词
Minimal Important Difference; HRQL Measure; HRQL Instrument; Inform Treatment Decision; Instrument Selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Integrating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as an endpoint for randomized surgical trials provides valuable insight into the patients’ perspective on treatment outcome. Health related quality of life data also play a role in ensuring fully informed consent, determining treatment options and informing treatment decision making. However, few randomized surgical trials have been conducted that meet the minimum requirements for rigorous HRQL assessment and, despite increasing efforts to improve the reporting of randomized trials, many are still not adequately performed. Such methodologic limitations may influence trial findings for HRQL outcomes and undermine the ability of the data collected to inform clinical practice. This review describes key methodological aspects of HRQL assessment that are required in randomized trials to ensure that data are robust. This includes choice of HRQL instrument, the method and timing of assessments and data analysis and presentation. The review also makes recommendations for future research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1172
页数:9
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [11] Haheim LL(1985)Quality of life after breast cancer surgery J Surg Oncol 28 123-342
  • [12] Soreide JA(1986)The effect of radical and conserving surgery on the quality of life of early breast cancer patients Eur J Surg Oncol 12 337-1237
  • [13] Efficace F(1988)Psychosocial outcome in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of primary breast cancer Cancer 62 1231-375
  • [14] Bottomley A(1989)Breast conservation versus mastectomy: distress sequelae as a function of choice J Clin Oncol 7 367-334
  • [15] Osoba D(1997)A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy Eur J Surg Oncol 23 327-314
  • [16] Goodwin PJ(1998)Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG) Eur J Cancer 34 307-551
  • [17] Black JT(2000)Quality of life of patients with newly diagnosed poor prognosis M1 prostate cancer undergoing orchiectomy without or with mitomycin C. Results from the EORTC Phase-III trial 30893 Eur Urol 37 541-318
  • [18] Bordeleau LJ(1999)Long-term results of a randomized trial for the treatment of stages B2 and C prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy with a common endocrine therapy in both modalities Urology 54 313-456
  • [19] Efficace F(1998)A randomized comparison of ‘Casodex’ (bicalutamide) 150 mg monotherapy versus castration in the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced prostate cancer Eur Urol 33 447-796
  • [20] Bottomley A(2002)Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting N Engl J Med 347 790-822