Influenza treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility in healthy adults in the United Kingdom

被引:12
作者
Sander B. [1 ,5 ]
Gyldmark M. [2 ]
Hayden F.G. [3 ]
Morris J. [4 ]
Mueller E. [1 ]
Bergemann R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute for Medical Outcome Research GmbH, Lörrach
[2] Health Economics and Strategic Pricing, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Pharmaceuticals Division, Basel
[3] Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
[4] Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn
[5] Division of Clinical Decision-Making and Health Care Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont.
关键词
Antivirals; Cost-effectiveness; Decision modeling; Influenza; Treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-005-0297-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of treating influenza with neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) from a health care payer's and societal perspective in the United Kingdom. A simulation model was developed to predict morbidity and mortality due to influenza and its specified complications, comparing neuraminidase inhibitors with usual care in an otherwise healthy adult population. Robustness of the results was tested by one-way and multiway as well as probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Treatment with either neuraminidase inhibitor results in reduced morbidity and faster return to normal activities. However, oseltamivir dominates zanamivir in cost-utility analysis due to its lower costs. Comparing oseltamivir with usual care, the costs are £14.36 per day of normal activity gained and £5,600 per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the healthcare payer perspective. Oseltamivir dominates usual care from the societal perspective. Treatment with oseltamivir is a cost-effective strategy for otherwise healthy adults in the UK from both the healthcare payer and societal perspective. © Springer Medizin Verlag 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Meier C., Napalkov P., Wegmuller Y., Jefferson T., Jick H., Population-based study on incidence, risk factors, clinical complications and drug utilisation associated with influenza in the United Kingdom, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 19, pp. 834-842, (2000)
[2]  
Guidance on the Use of Zanamivir, Oseltamivir and Amantadinefor the Treatment of Influenza. Technology Appraisal Guidance No 58, (2003)
[3]  
Baltussen R., Reinders A., Sprenger M., Postma M., Jager J., Ament A., Et al., Estimating influenza-related hospitalization in The Netherlands, Epidemiol Infect, 121, pp. 129-138, (1998)
[4]  
Simonsen L., Fukuda K., Schonberger L., Cox N., The impact of influenza epidemics on hospitalizations, J Infect Dis, 181, pp. 831-837, (2000)
[5]  
Kaiser L., Keene O., Hammond J., Elliott M., Hayden F., Impact of zanamivir on antibiotic use for respiratory events following acute influenza in adolescents and adults, Arch Intern Med, 160, pp. 3234-3240, (2000)
[6]  
Bochud B., Moser F., Erard P., Verdon F., Studer J., Villard G., Et al., Community-acquired pneumonia. A prospective outpatient study, Medicine, 80, pp. 75-87, (2001)
[7]  
H+ Spitalstatistiken, (1997)
[8]  
British National Formulary No 42, (2001)
[9]  
Netten A., Rees T., Harrison G., Unit Costs of Health and Social Care, (2001)
[10]  
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), (1997)