The ‘Is’ and the ‘Ought’ of the Animal Organism: Hegel’s Account of Biological Normativity

被引:0
作者
Luca Corti
机构
[1] University of Padua,
来源
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences | 2022年 / 44卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates Hegel’s account of the animal organism as it is presented in the Philosophy of Nature, with a special focus on its normative implications. I argue that the notion of “organisation” is fundamental to Hegel’s theory of animal normativity. The paper starts by showing how a Hegelian approach takes up the scientific image of organism and assigns a basic explanatory role to the notion of “organisation” in its understanding living beings. Moving from this premise, the paper turns to the group of accounts in contemporary theoretical biology known as “organisational accounts” (OA), which offer a widely debated strategy for naturalizing teleology and normativity in organisms. As recent scholarship recognizes, these accounts explicitly rely on insights from Kant and Post-Kantianism. I make the historical and conceptual argument that Hegel’s view of the organism shares several basic commitments with OAs, especially regarding the notion of “organisational closure”. I assess the account of normativity that such accounts advance and its implications for how we approach Hegel. Finally, I argue that the notion of “organisation” is more fundamental to Hegel’s theory of animal normativity than the Aristotelian notion of “Gattung” or “species”, which by contrast appears derivative – at least in the Philosophy of Nature and the Lectures – and does not play the central role in his account maintained by some scholars.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Artiga M(2011)‘Re-Organizing Organisational Accounts of Function.’ Applied Ontology 6 105-124
  • [2] Artiga M(2016)‘The Organisational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function.’ Acta Biotheoretica 64 105-117
  • [3] Martínez M(2011)‘On the Role of Constraints in the Emergence of Biological Organisation ’ Logic and Philosophy of Science 9 381-388
  • [4] Bich L(2008)Order in the Nothing: Autopoiesis and the Organisational Characterization of the Living Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 4 343-373
  • [5] Mossio M(2016)Biological regulation: controlling the system from within Biology and Philosophy 31 237-265
  • [6] Bich L(2005)‘Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel. Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts ’ Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 3 131-161
  • [7] Damiano L(2007)‘The structure of desire and recognition: Self-consciousness and self-constitution.’ Philosophy Social Criticism 33 127-150
  • [8] Bich L(2010)‘What is an “organism”? On the occurrence of a new term and its conceptual transformations 1680–1850’ History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32 155-194
  • [9] Mossio M(2006)‘From the organism of a body to the body of an organism: Occurrence and meaning of the word ‘organism’ from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries’ The British Journal for the History of Science 39 319-339
  • [10] Ruiz-Mirazo K(2002)‘The process dynamics of normative function.’ The Monist 85 3-28