Metadiscourse, knowledge advancement, and emotions in primary school students’ knowledge building

被引:0
作者
Gaoxia Zhu
Marlene Scardamalia
Raadiyah Nazeem
Zoe Donoahue
Leanne Ma
Zhixin Lai
机构
[1] National Institute of Education (NIE),Learning Sciences and Assessment Academic Group
[2] Nanyang Technological University,Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
[3] University of Toronto,Institute of Child Study
[4] Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,undefined
[5] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
Instructional Science | 2024年 / 52卷
关键词
Knowledge building; Discourse; Metadiscourse; Epistemic emotions; Primary school;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge Building principles such as real ideas, authentic problems; epistemic agency; and collective responsibility for advancement of community knowledge convey ways in which Knowledge Building mirrors work in knowledge-creating communities. Previous studies suggest Metadiscourse—discourse about discourse—helps sustain and improve community knowledge. Do students’ emotions differ during metadiscourse compared to other discourse contexts? Is metadiscourse even possible in early elementary grades? If so, what emotions are associated with discourse moves requiring high-level reflection on prior discourse? Is it possible that such reflection engenders positive emotions required for sustained creative work with ideas? To address these issues, the authors engaged 22 grade 2 students (7 years old) in monthly metadiscourse sessions over four months, during which they discussed how their ideas changed, what they still wondered about, and what ideas they wanted to pursue. Video recordings of face-to-face sessions, online Knowledge Forum notes, students’ interviews, teacher’s reflections, and field notes were analyzed using discourse analysis, multi-faceted coding, and correlation analysis. The authors examined how students’ emotions and discourse moves differ in Knowledge Building discourse and metadiscourse and correlations between emotions and different discourse moves. The results show: (1) greater levels of enjoyment, reflection on previous ideas, and proposals for new directions for inquiry during metadiscourse sessions; (2) confidence positively associated with explanations and proposals for new directions for inquiry; (3) positive emotions associated with increasingly challenging cognitive work. The relationships between early elementary-grade students’ emotions and cognition during Knowledge Building is an underdeveloped area of investigation; in an effort to guide future research a model for regulating emotions in Knowledge Building is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 40
页数:39
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Bakhtiar A(2017)Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate Metacognition and Learning 13 57-90
[2]  
Webster EA(1994)Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's world 3 Educational Researcher 23 21-23
[3]  
Hadwin AF(2019)Getting a grip: The PET framework for studying how reader emotions influence comprehension Discourse Processes 56 386-401
[4]  
Bereiter C(2015)Advancing knowledge building discourse through judgments of promising ideas International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 10 345-366
[5]  
Bohn-Gettler CM(2010)Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 143-186
[6]  
Chen B(2000)Confidence its role in the creative teaching and learning of design and technology Journal of Technology Education 12 18-31
[7]  
Scardamalia M(2022)Emotions and the comprehension of single versus multiple texts during game-based learning Discourse Processes 59 94-115
[8]  
Bereiter C(1980)A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills Psychological Review 87 477-531
[9]  
Damşa CI(2017)Affective learning: Improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 27 119-158
[10]  
Kirschner PA(1997)The motive to avoid failure and test anxiety responses: Empirical support for integration of two research traditions Anxiety, Stress & Coping 10 35-57