A meta-analysis of the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic diversity in mammals

被引:0
作者
Ana Lino
Carlos Fonseca
Danny Rojas
Erich Fischer
Maria João Ramos Pereira
机构
[1] University of Aveiro,Department of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM)
[2] Stony Brook University,Department of Ecology and Evolution
[3] Pontificia Uníversídad Javeriana Cali,Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematícs
[4] Universídade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul,Instituto de Biociencias
[5] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,Department of Zoology, Institute of Biosciences
来源
Mammalian Biology | 2019年 / 94卷
关键词
Allelic diversity; Habitat loss; Heterozygosity; Inbreeding; Mammals;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Human activities have led to global changes with direct consequences for biodiversity. For this reason, special concerns have arisen, particularly in respect to global threats such as habitat loss and fragmentation, because they decrease population size, promote the loss of species genetic diversity, contract species geographical distribution and facilitate species loss. Interest in the genetic consequences related to habitat changes has increased in the last decades, so it became crucial to understand how genetic diversity changes due to habitat loss and fragmentation and if the degree of genetic losses is related with species traits. Thus, we conduct a metaanalysis to test if genetic diversity of mammalian populations that live in fragments is lower than those living in continuous habitats and we also explore which species traits could be related with the observed patterns. Through this metaanalysis we detected an overall decrease in allelic diversity, allelic richness, observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity in mammalian species that live in situations of high habitat fragmentation. However, not all species are affected the same way. We found that species with larger body mass are the most negatively affected by fragmentation; terrestrial and arboreal mammals are more negatively affected than flying species; herbivores suffer consistent negative effect of fragmentation in the four genetic measures analysed; and forestdependent species are the most susceptible to the negative effects of fragmentation. We expected to detect an increase in inbreeding coefficients in fragments when compared to continuous habitats; however, this pattern did not arise, probably because time since fragmentation was not enough and/or species have ways to avoid inbreeding. The patterns here described allow a better understanding of which mammalian species are more susceptible to the negative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation, potentially giving support for the conservation and management of their populations.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:7
相关论文
共 223 条
[11]  
Leberg PL(2013)Rethinkingthe conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research Evol. Appl 6 949-959
[12]  
Batáry P(1997)Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes Br. Med. J 315 629-634
[13]  
Báldi A(2006)Gene flow and demographic history of leopards Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 81 117-142
[14]  
Biedermann R(2003) in the centrál Indián highlands Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 34 487-515
[15]  
Blackburn TM(1996)Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test Conserv. Biol 10 1500-1508
[16]  
Gaston KJ(2001)Confounding factors in the detection of species responsesto habitat fragmentation Biol. Conserv 100 15-20
[17]  
Cockburn A(2015)Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity J. Biogeogr 42 989-994
[18]  
Scott M(2002)Relationship of genetic to population relationship variation size in wildlife Ann. Zool. Fennici 39 275-290
[19]  
Scotts D(2011)Demography versus habitat fragmentation as determinants of genetic variation inwild populations Methods Ecol. Evol 2 1-10
[20]  
Crooks KR(2004)Habitat fragmentation and species richness Biodivers. Conserv 13 207-251