Cementless acetabular revision: Past, present, and future - Revision total hip arthroplasty: The acetabular side using cementless implants

被引：0

作者：

Pulido L. ^{[1
]}

Rachala S.R. ^{[2
]}

Cabanela M.E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905

[2] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203

来源：

International Orthopaedics | 2011年 / 35卷 / 2期

关键词：

Aseptic Loosening; Acetabular Component; Acetabular Revision; Trabecular Metal; Acetabular Defect;

D O I：

10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Acetabular revision is probably the most difficult aspect of hip reconstructive surgery. Although the majority of acetabular revisions can be performed using an uncemented hemispherical acetabular device with ancillary fixation, patients with severe acetabular deficiencies and poor bone quality require more complex alternatives for revision. The limitations of traditional cementless acetabular implants has promoted the development of improved methods of fixation and revision techniques. Highly porous metals have been introduced for clinical use in arthroplasty surgery over the last decade. Their higher porosity and surface friction are ideal for acetabular revision, optimising biological fixation. The use of trabecular metal cups in acetabular revision has yielded excellent clinical results. Purpose: This review focuses on the use of cementless implants for acetabular revision. The use of trabecular metal cups, augments, jumbo cups, oblong cups, cages, and structural grafting are also discussed. © Springer-Verlag 2010.

引用

页码：289 / 298

页数：9

共 46 条

[1]

Learmonth I.D., Young C., Rorabeck C., The operation of the century: Total hip replacement, Lancet, 370, 9597, pp. 1508-1519, (2007)

[2]

Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M., Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 89, 4, pp. 780-785, (2007)

[3]

Clohisy J.C., Calvert G., Tull F., McDonald D., Maloney W.J., Reasons for revision hip surgery: A retrospective review, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 429, pp. 188-192, (2004)

[4]

Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M., Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up evaluation, Journal of Arthroplasty, 9, 1, pp. 33-44, (1994)

[5]

Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G., O'Rourke M.R., Managing bone loss in acetabular revision, Instr Course Lect, 55, pp. 287-297, (2006)

[6]

Kavanagh B.F., Ilstrup D.M., Fitzgerald Jr. R.H., Revision total hip arthroplasty, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 67, 4, pp. 517-526, (1985)

[7]

Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellicci P.M., Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 67, 7, pp. 1074-1085, (1985)

[8]

Katz R.P., Callaghan J.J., Sullivan P.M., Johnston R.C., Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 79, 2, pp. 322-326, (1997)

[9]

Lie S.A., Havelin L.I., Furnes O.N., Engesaester L.B., Vollset S.E., Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian arthroplasty register, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 86, 4, pp. 504-509, (2004)

[10]

Bobyn J.D., Poggie R.A., Krygier J.J., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D., Lewis R.J., Unger A.S., O'Keefe T.J., Christie M.J., Nasser S., Wood J.E., Stulberg S.D., Tanzer M., Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86 A, SUPPL. 2, pp. 123-2129, (2004)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →