The cultural evolution of collective property rights for sustainable resource governance

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey Andrews
Matthew Clark
Vicken Hillis
Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
机构
[1] Max Plank Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology,Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture
[2] Imperial College London,Centre for Environmental Policy
[3] Boise State University,Human
[4] University of California Davis,Environment Systems
[5] Santa Fe Institute,undefined
[6] University of Bristol,undefined
来源
Nature Sustainability | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With commons encompassing approximately 65% of Earth’s surface and vast tracts of the ocean, a critical challenge for sustainability involves establishing effective institutions for governing these common-pool resources (CPR). While examples of successful governance exist, the circumstances and mechanisms behind their development have often faded from historical records and memories. Drawing on ethnographic work, we introduce a generic evolutionary multigroup modelling framework that examines the emergence, stability and temporal dynamics of collective property rights. Our research reveals a fundamental insight: when intergroup conflicts over resources exist, establishing and enforcing ‘access rights’ becomes an essential prerequisite for evolving sustainable ‘use rights’. These access rights, in turn, enable cultural group selection and facilitate the evolution of sustainable use rights through the imitation of successful groups. Moreover, we identify four crucial aspects within these systems: (1) seizures in CPR systems create individual-level incentives to enforce use and access rights; (2) support for collective property rights is frequency dependent and prone to oscillations; (3) the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is a tipping point that alters the interplay between individual and group-level selection pressures; (4) success-biased social learning (imitation) of out-group members plays a vital role in spreading sustainable institutions and preventing the tragedy of the commons.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 412
页数:8
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Ostrom E(2003)How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action J. Theor. Polit. 15 239-270
[2]  
Dell’Angelo J(2016)Community water governance on Mount Kenya: an assessment based on Ostrom’s design principles of natural resource management Mt. Res. Dev. 36 102-115
[3]  
Ostrom E(2007)A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 15181-15187
[4]  
Cumming G(2020)Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 44 26-34
[5]  
Mahajan SL(2021)A theory-based framework for understanding the establishment, persistence, and diffusion of community-based conservation Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3 e299-230
[6]  
Bennett DA(2011)Toward an understanding of provenance in complex land use dynamics J. Land Use Sci. 6 211-558
[7]  
Tang W(2023)The commons Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 48 531-S10
[8]  
Wang S(2013)Evolution as a general theoretical framework for economics and public policy J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 90 S3-S32
[9]  
Agrawal A(2013)Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 90 S21-8835
[10]  
Erbaugh J(2013)Coevolution of farming and private property during the early holocene Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110 8830-86