Development of an Entropy Method for Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network Design

被引:25
作者
Alizadeh Z. [1 ]
Yazdi J. [1 ]
Moridi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran
关键词
Artificial neural network (ANN); Differential evolution (DE); Entropy; Groundwater; Monitoring; Optimization;
D O I
10.1007/s40710-018-0335-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A new approach is presented based on the entropy theory to design an optimal groundwater quality monitoring network. First, the unrecorded values of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) are estimated in the study area using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) methods, and then, using Differential Evolution (DE) optimization algorithm aimed at maximizing the pure information gained by stations. The number and location of monitoring stations are selected optimally from the active wells located in the study area. The spatial distribution of chosen wells provides adequate coverage of the whole aquifer and, at the same time, gives the maximum useful information about the water quality status. It also avoids selecting any redundant station considering the operational and temporal costs. The proposed entropy method is compared with “error minimization” and “K-Means clustering” methods and is shown to be superior. The proposed approach is used for optimizing Eshtehard aquifer monitoring network in central part of Iran. As a result of its implementation, 20 wells are selected among 79 active monitoring wells in the study area, so that by sampling the wells, the maximum qualitative information can be obtained without needing to sample all the wells. © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 788
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Alfonso L., Optimisation of Monitoring Networks for Water Systems, Information Theory, Value of Information and Public Participation, (2010)
[2]  
Alizadeh Z., Mahjouri N., A spatiotemporal Bayesian maximum entropy-based methodology for dealing with sparse data in revising groundwater quality monitoring networks: the Tehran region experience, Environ Earth Sci, 76, (2017)
[3]  
Ayvaz M.T., Elci A., Identification of the optimum groundwater quality monitoring network using a genetic algorithm based optimization approach, J Hydrol, 563, pp. 1078-1091, (2018)
[4]  
Barca E., Pasarella G., Vurro M., Morea A., MSANOS: data-driven, multi-approach software for optimal redesign of environmental monitoring networks, Water Resour Manag, 29, pp. 619-644, (2015)
[5]  
Bhat S., Motz L.H., Pathak C., Kuebler L., Geostatistics-based groundwater-level monitoring network design and its application to the upper Floridan aquifer, USA, Environ Monit Assess, 187, (2015)
[6]  
Boltzmann L., Uber die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Warmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung respektive den Satzen uber das Warmgleichgewicht, Weiner Berichte, 76, pp. 373-435, (1877)
[7]  
Bruno D.E., Barca E., Goncalves R.M., Queiroz H.A., Berardi L., Passarella G., Linear and evolutionary polynomial regression models to forecast coastal dynamics: comparison and reliability assessment, Geomorphology, 300, pp. 128-140, (2018)
[8]  
Datta B., Singh D., Optimal groundwater monitoring network design for pollution plume estimation with active sources, Int J of Geomate, 6, (2014)
[9]  
Deb K., Anand A., Joshi D., A computationally efficient evolutionary algorithm for real-parameter optimization, Evol Comput, 10, 4, pp. 371-395, (2002)
[10]  
Esquivel J.M., Morales G.P., Esteller M.V., Groundwater monitoring network design using GIS and multicriteria analysis, Water Resour Manag, 29, pp. 3175-3194, (2015)