Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size

被引:1
作者
Krishna Udayasankar
机构
[1] National University of Singapore,Business Policy
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2008年 / 83卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Resources; Size; Visibility; Scale of operations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Small and medium-sized firms form 90% of the worldwide population of businesses. However, it has been argued that given their smaller scale of operations, resource access constraints and lower visibility, smaller firms are less likely to participate in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. This article examines the different economic motivations of firms with varying combinations of visibility, resource access and scale of operations. Arguments are presented to propose that in terms of visibility, resource access and operating scale, very small and very large firms are equally motivated to participate in CSR. However, the motivational bases for CSR participation are likely to be different. Medium-sized firms are the least motivated. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between firm size and CSR participation. This study contributes towards resolution of the long-standing debate on the effects of firm size on CSR participation, and highlights the importance of considering configurations of firm characteristics in the study of CSR outcomes. In conclusion, cautions are raised against the broad categorization of firms, without adequate attention to the underlying dimensions of such categorizations.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 175
页数:8
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Adams M.(1998)An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence Journal of Management Studies 35 641-654
[2]  
Hardwick P.(2000)Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations Journal of Business Ethics 28 243-255
[3]  
Albinger H. S.(2003)A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy Academy of Management Review 28 71-88
[4]  
Freeman S. J.(1988)Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity Administrative Science Quarterly 33 82-100
[5]  
Aragon-Correa J. A.(2002)Governance and Corporate Philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society 41 319-345
[6]  
Sharma S.(1988)Organization Structure and Corporate Social Performance: A Field Study in Two Contrasting Industries Academy of Management Journal 31 642-662
[7]  
Atkinson L.(2004)Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk Journal of Investing 13 57-66
[8]  
Galaskiewicz J.(1999)Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-Maker Social Consciousness Journal of Business Ethics 19 375-383
[9]  
Bartkus B. R.(1987)`The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis' Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 111-122
[10]  
Morris S. A.(1995)The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 65-91