Effects of screening and brief intervention training on resident and faculty alcohol intervention behaviours: A pre- post-intervention assessment

被引:32
作者
Seale J.P. [1 ]
Shellenberger S. [1 ]
Boltri J.M. [1 ]
Okosun I.S. [2 ]
Barton B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Family Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Medical Center of Central Georgia, Macon, GA 31210
[2] Institute of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, One Park Place South
关键词
Implementation Phase; Risky Drinker; Alcohol Screening; Harmful Drinking; Family Medicine Residency;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-6-46
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many hazardous and harmful drinkers do not receive clinician advice to reduce their drinking. Previous studies suggest under-detection and clinician reluctance to intervene despite awareness of problem drinking (PD). The Healthy Habits Project previously reported chart review data documenting increased screening and intervention with hazardous and harmful drinkers after training clinicians and implementing routine screening. This report describes the impact of the Healthy Habits training program on clinicians' rates of identification of PD, level of certainty in identifying PD and the proportion of patients given advice to reduce alcohol use, based on self-report data using clinician exit questionnaires. Methods: 28 residents and 10 faculty in a family medicine residency clinic completed four cycles of clinician exit interview questionnaires before and after screening and intervention training. Rates of identifying PD, level of diagnostic certainty, and frequency of advice to reduce drinking were compared across intervention status (pre vs. post). Findings were compared with rates of PD and advice to reduce drinking documented on chart review. Results: 1,052 clinician exit questionnaires were collected. There were no significant differences in rates of PD identified before and after intervention (9.8% vs. 7.4%, p = .308). Faculty demonstrated greater certainty in PD diagnoses than residents (p = .028) and gave more advice to reduce drinking (p = .042) throughout the program. Faculty and residents reported higher levels of diagnostic certainty after training (p = .039 and .030, respectively). After training, residents showed greater increases than faculty in the percentage of patients given advice to reduce drinking (p = .038), and patients felt to be problem drinkers were significantly more likely to receive advice to reduce drinking by all clinicians (50% vs. 75%, p = .047). The number of patients receiving advice to reduce drinking after program implementation exceeded the number of patients felt to be problem drinkers. Recognition rates of PD were four to eight times higher than rates documented on chart review (p = .028). Conclusion: This program resulted in greater clinician certainty in diagnosing PD and increases in the number of patients with PD who received advice to reduce drinking. Future programs should include booster training sessions and emphasize documentation of PD and brief intervention. © 2005 Seale et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Babor T.F., Higgins-Biddle J., Dauser D., Higgins P., Burleson J., Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care settings: Implementation models and predictors, J Stud Alcohol, 66, pp. 361-368, (2005)
  • [32] Bush K., Kivlahan D.R., McDonnell M.B., Fihn S.D., Bradley K.A., The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Arch Intern Med, 158, pp. 1789-1795, (1998)
  • [33] Gordon A.J., Maisto S.A., McNeil M., Kraemer K.L., Conigliaro R., Kelly M.E., Conigliaro J., Three questions can detect hazardous drinkers, J Fam Pract, 50, pp. 313-320, (2001)
  • [34] Bradley K.A., Bush K.R., Epler A.J., Dobie D.J., Davis T.M., Sporleder J.L., Maynard C., Burman M.L., Kivlahan D.R., Two brief alcohol-screening tests from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population, Arch Intern Med, 163, pp. 821-829, (2003)
  • [35] Saunders J.B., Aasland O.G., Babor T.F., De La Fuente J.R., Grant M., Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption - II, Addiction, 88, pp. 791-804, (1993)
  • [36] SPSS for Windows Release 11.5.0 [Computer Program], (2002)
  • [37] Ockene J.K., Wheeler E.V., Adams A., Hurley T.G., Hebert J., Provider training for patient-centered alcohol counseling in a primary care setting, Arch Intern Med, 157, pp. 2334-2341, (1997)
  • [38] Whitlock E.P., Polen M.R., Green C.A., Orleans T., Klein J., U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Ann Intern Med, 140, pp. 557-568, (2004)
  • [39] Clement S., The identification of alcohol-related problems by general practitioners, Br J Addict, 81, pp. 257-264, (1986)
  • [40] Kaner E.F., Wutzke S., Saunders J.B., Powell A., Morawski J., Bouix J.C., Impact of alcohol education and training on general practitioners' diagnostic and management skills: Findings from a World Health Organization collaborative study, J Stud Alcohol, 62, pp. 621-627, (2001)