Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: Comparison between different approaches

被引：93

作者：

D'Arrigo C. ^{[1
]}

Speranza A. ^{[1
]}

Monaco E. ^{[1
]}

Carcangiu A. ^{[1
]}

Ferretti A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] II School of Medicine, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome

来源：

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | 2009年 / 10卷 / 1期

关键词：

Antero-lateral approach; Hipreplacement; Learning curve; Tissue sparing surgery;

D O I：

10.1007/s10195-008-0043-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: The tissue sparing surgery (TSS) concept means not only smaller incisions but also less tissue disruption, allowing decreased blood loss and improved function. However, TSS techniques can result in more complications related to the learning curve. The aim of this study was to compare the learning curve of an experienced surgeon with different TSS approaches for total hip replacement (THR) from a clinical and surgical point of view, focussing especially on complications related to the use of different geometric stems. Materials and methods: Sixty patients scheduled to be operated for a primary THR were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to surgery by one of three different TSS approaches: lateral with mini incision (group A), minimally invasive anterior (group B) and minimally invasive antero-lateral (group C). Results from the three TSS groups were compared with a control group of 149 patients (group D). Results: Our results reveal significantly reduced blood loss in the TSS groups compared with the control group, with no differences between the TSS groups. We found better early functional scores in the two minimally invasive groups (anterior and anterolateral), and a lower rate of complications with the antero-lateral TSS approach. Conclusion: The antero-lateral TSS approach seems to be safer and less demanding than standard THR surgery, and is suitable for use with different stems. © Springer-Verlag 2009.

引用

页码：47 / 54

页数：7

共 17 条

[1]

Berry D.J., Minimally invasive" total hip arthroplasties. Editorial, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87 A, 4, pp. 699-700, (2005)

[2]

Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., Et al., Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86, pp. 1353-1358, (2004)

[3]

Archibeck M.J., White Jr. R.E., Learning curve for the two incision total hip replacement, Clin Orthop, 429, pp. 232-238, (2004)

[4]

Hardinge K., The direct lateral approach to the hip, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64 B, 1, pp. 17-19, (1982)

[5]

Rachbauer F., Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach, Orthopade, 35, 7, pp. 726-729, (2006)

[6]

Rottinger H., The MIS anterolateral approach for THA, Orthopade, 35, 7, pp. 710-715, (2006)

[7]

Rosencher N., Kerkkamp H.E., Macheras G., Munuera L.M., Menichella G., Barton D.M., Cremers S., Abraham I.L., OSTHEO investigation. Orthopedic surgery transfusion hemoglobin European overview (OSTHEO) study: Blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe, Transfusion, 43, 4, pp. 459-469, (2003)

[8]

Harris W.H., Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end results study using a new method of result evaluation, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51 A, pp. 737-755, (1969)

[9]

Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Et al., Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, J Rheumatol, 15, 12, pp. 1833-1840, (1988)

[10]

Huo M.H., Parvizi J., Gilbert N.F., What's new in hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, pp. 2100-2113, (2006)

← 1 2 →