Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry

被引:0
作者
Christofer F. Daiberl
Sascha Julian Oks
Angela Roth
Kathrin M. Möslein
Steven Alter
机构
[1] Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,Chair of Information Systems, Innovation and Value Creation
[2] HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management,CLIC – Center for Leading Innovation & Cooperation
[3] University of San Francisco,undefined
来源
Electronic Markets | 2019年 / 29卷
关键词
Multi-sided platforms; Open innovation; Work system theory; Medical technology industry cluster; Action research; M1;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Innovation in the medical technology (med tech) industry has a major impact on well-being in society. Open innovation has the potential to accelerate the development of new or improved healthcare solutions. Building on work system theory (WST), this paper explores how a multi-sided open innovation platform can systematically be established in a German med tech industry cluster in situations where firms had no prior experience with this approach. We aim to uncover problems that may arise and identify opportunities for overcoming them. We performed an action research study in which we implemented and evaluated a multi-sided web-based open innovation platform in four real-world innovation challenges. Analyzing the four different challenges fostered a deeper understanding of the conceptual and organizational aspects of establishing the multi-sided open innovation platform as part of a larger work system. Reflecting on the findings, we developed five design principles that shall support the establishment of multi-sided open innovation platforms in other contexts. Thus, this paper contributes to both theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 728
页数:17
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Adamczyk S(2012)Innovation contests: a review, classification and outlook Creativity and Innovation Management 21 335-360
[2]  
Bullinger AC(2002)A customer-oriented new service development process Journal of Services Marketing 16 515-534
[3]  
Möslein KM(2011)Twenty years of electronic markets research - looking backwards towards the future Electronic Markets 21 41-51
[4]  
Alam I(2013)Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14 72-121
[5]  
Perry C(2015)Work system theory as a platform: response to a research perspective article by Niederman and March Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16 485-514
[6]  
Alt R(2010)Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation European Journal of Innovation Management 13 100-119
[7]  
Klein S(2004)Special issue on action research in information systems: making IS research relevant to practice— foreword MIS Quarterly 28 329-335
[8]  
Alter S(1996)A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research Journal of Information Technology 11 235-246
[9]  
Alter S(2018)Open innovation: research, practices, and policies California Management Review 60 5-16
[10]  
Antikainen M(2010)Crossing horizons: leveraging cross-industry innovation search in the front-end of the innovation process International Journal of Innovation Management 14 683-702