Randomized trial of low-dose interleukin-2 vs cyclosporine A and interferon-γ after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with high-risk primary breast cancer

被引:0
作者
L T Vahdat
D J Cohen
D Zipin
K S Lo
D Donovan
D Savage
A Tiersten
G Nichols
A Troxel
C S Hesdorffer
机构
[1] Weill Medical College of Cornell University,Division of Medical Oncology
[2] New York University Cancer Institute,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
[3] Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center of Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons,undefined
[4] Bennett Cancer Center Stamford Hospital,undefined
[5] University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,undefined
[6] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2007年 / 40卷
关键词
stem cell transplant; breast cancer; immunotherapy; interleukin-2; cyclosporine A; interferon-;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
High-risk primary breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCS) have shown prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in many studies; however, only one trial has demonstrated an overall survival benefit (OS). We hypothesize that the period following myeloablative therapy is ideal for immunologic manipulation and studied the effects of two different methods of immunotherapy following HDC with SCS aimed at the window of immune reconstitution. Seventy-two women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer were randomized following HDC to receive either interleukin 2 (IL-2) at 1 million units/m2 SQ daily for 28 days or combined cyclosporine A (CsA) at 1.25 mg/kg intravenously daily from day 0 to +28 and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) 0.025 mg/m2 SQ every 2 days from day +7 to +28. At a median follow-up of 67 months, no significant difference was observed in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. The IL-2 arm had a 59% DFS (95% CI (0.45, 0.78)) and a 72% OS (95% CI (0.58, 0.88)) at 5 years. The CsA/INF-γ arm had a similar outcome with a 55% DFS (95% CI (0.40, 0.76)) and a 78% OS (95% CI (0.65, 0.94)) at 5 years. Treatment was well tolerated, without increased toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:5
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]  
Roche H(2003)High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer: the French PEGASE experience Cancer Control 10 42-47
[2]  
Viens P(2002)High-dose chemotherapy with autograft(PBP) support is not superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-FU following doxorubicin induction in patients with breast cancer and 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes: the Anglo-Celtic I study Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 21 42a-1944
[3]  
Biron P(2005)Comparison of rapidly cycled tandem high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral-blood stem-cell support versus dose-dense conventional chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase III trial Lancet 366 1935-16
[4]  
Lotz JP(2003)High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for high-risk breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 7-26
[5]  
Asselain B(2003)Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 17-2200
[6]  
Crown J(2005)Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13 J Clin Oncol 23 2191-2336
[7]  
Lind M(2006)Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for high-risk primary breast carcinoma: follow-up at 12 years Cancer 106 2327-1073
[8]  
Gould A(1979)Antileukemic effect of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of allogeneic-marrow grafts N Engl J Med 300 1068-8
[9]  
Verrill M(1983)Graft-versus-host disease in cyclosporin A-treated rats after syngeneic and autologous bone marrow reconstitution J Exp Med 158 1-533
[10]  
Twelves C(1990)Effector mechanisms in cyclosporine A-induced syngeneic graft-versus-host disease. Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets J Immunol 145 526-1171